2009 Department of Justice, Domestic Violence & Murder-Suicide in Families

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/topics/crime/intimate-partner-violence/murder-suicide.htm

 

Murder-Suicide in Families

Cases in which one intimate partner murders another and the children and then kills him- or herself are rare and usually garner widespread media coverage. This type of murder-suicide is called familicide.

In almost all of these cases, the killer is a white, non-Hispanic man [1].

Cases in which women kill their male partners, their children and themselves are extremely rare and thus gain even more widespread media coverage.

Learn more about:

Risk Factors

Common characteristics of murder-suicide in families include:

  • Prior history of domestic violence [2], [3].
  • Access to a gun [4], [5].
  • Threats, especially increased threats with increased specificity [6].
  • Prior history of poor mental health or substance abuse, especially alcohol [7].

Previous history of abuse is by far the most dominant risk factor. In one study, 82 percent of the men who killed their intimate partners were known to the authorities — treatment professionals, the military or the criminal justice system, for example [8].

In most cases, the man exhibits possessive, obsessive and jealous behavior. There is a gradual build-up of tensions and conflicts after which an event leads the man to act. The triggering event is often the woman’s announcement that she is leaving.

The time immediately after a woman leaves an abusive partner is the most dangerous [9].

Read an article from the NIJ Journal about a tool to help assess a woman’s risk of being a victim of murder suicide (pdf, 6 pages).

Role of Guns

The data are clear: More incidents of murder-suicide occur with guns than with any other weapon. Access to a gun is a major risk factor in familicide because it allows the perpetrator to act on his or her rage and impulses.

In 591 murder-suicides, 92 percent were committed with a gun [10]. States with less restrictive gun control laws have as much as eight times the rate of murder-suicides as those with the most restrictive gun control laws.

Compared to Canada, the United States has three times more familicide; compared to Britain, eight times more; and compared to Australia, 15 times more.

Read more about gun-violence prevention.

Role of Shelters

Domestic violence shelters are meeting the needs of abuse survivors and their children, providing services like housing, mental health counseling and legal assistance. Nearly three-quarters (74 percent) of domestic violence survivors rate the assistance they received at their shelters as "very helpful," and another 18 percent rate it as "helpful."

Read more about what women say about shelters Exit Notice.

Role of the Economy

The very low number of murder-suicide incidents makes it hard for researchers to understand exactly what role the economy plays in these cases. What is known is that economic distress is a factor, but it is only one of several factors that trigger a man to murder his family. In most cases, the couple has a history of disagreement over many issues, most commonly money, sex and child-rearing.

Although personal economics like the loss of a job may be one of several critical factors, most experts agree that the strength or weakness of the national economy is not related to the frequency of murder-suicides, despite media coverage that suggests otherwise.

Next section: Practical Implications of Current Domestic Violence Research.

Notes

[1] Logan, J., Hill, H.A., Black, M.L., Crosby, A.E., Karch, D.L., Barnes, J.D. and Lubell, K.M., "Characteristics of Perpetrators in Homicide-Followed-by-Suicide Incidents: National Violent Death Reporting System — 17 US States, 2003-2005," American Journal of Epidemiology 168 (November 2008): 1056-1064.

[2], [9] Campbell, J.C., Glass, N., Sharps, P.W., Laughon, K., and Bloom, T., "Intimate Partner Violence, Trauma, Violence & Abuse," 8 (July 2007): 246-269.

[3], [4], [6], [7] Koziol-McLain, J., Webster, D., McFarlane, J., Block, C.R., Ulrich, Y., Glass, N. and Campbell, J., "Risk Factors for Femicide-Suicide in Abusive Relationships: Results from a Multisite Case Control Study," Violence and Victims 21 (February 2006): 3-21

[5] Adams, D., Why Do They Kill: Men Who Murder Their Intimate Partners, Vanderbilt University Press, 2007.

[8] Sharps, P.W., Koziol-McLain, J., Campbell, J., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., & Xu, X., "Health Care Providers’ Missed Opportunities for Preventing Femicide," Preventive Medicine 33, (November 2001):  373-380.

[10] Violence Policy Center. (May 2006). American Roulette: Murder-Suicide in the United States (pdf, 21 pages) Exit Notice. Retrieved July 22, 2009 from the Violence Policy Center Web site.

Date Entered: October 14, 2009

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Domestic violence on rise KansaS

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights – A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Domestic violence on rise

Kevin Elliotthttp://cjonline.com/stories/021909/kan_395652243.shtml

 

Three out of five victims of sexual or domestic violence don’t know where to go for help, victims’ advocates with the Kansas Coalition Against Sexual or Domestic Violence said Wednesday in Topeka.

Sandy Barnett, executive director of the coalition, said victims in Kansas had limited access to help for years, but an increase in funding from the Legislature three years ago expanded coverage of the state’s crisis centers.

Coalition members met Wednesday for the annual Safe Homes, Safe Streets Awareness day to discuss an increase in victims and possible funding cuts.

Barnett said statistics released by crisis centers across the state confirmed her suspicion that the number of victims would rise with the level of funding.

"Now we’re getting the first revelations," Barnett said. "Oh my goodness — the floodgates have opened."

Sharon Katz, executive director of Safehome Inc., in Overland Park, said the center relocated to a larger facility two years ago after lack of space forced it to turn away 542 victims in 2006. Despite the addition of about 15 beds, the center turned away 1,302 people in 2008.

The center is one of six in the Kansas City metropolitan area.

"Education and awareness are up," Katz said. "People know (help) is there. It’s hard to say if domestic violence or sexual assault is increasing dramatically."

Laura Patzner, executive director of the Family Crisis Center in Great Bend, said the center had a 42 percent increase in the number of victims over the past two years.

The Wichita Area Sexual Assault Center had a 30 percent increase in the number of victims taken in during 2008, said Kathy Williams, executive director.

Judy Davis, executive director of The Crisis Center and Kansas Crisis Hotline, in Manhattan, said the number of victims receiving services in 2008 increased by about 12.5 percent, with the hotline receiving a 10 percent call increase. She said the women’s shelter provided 5,600 nights of stay in 2008.

"It made it a hard year," Davis said.

Advocates said the spiraling economy could spur a further increase for demand as families on the brink of abuse experience added stress. The coalition is hoping for funding to remain at current levels as the need for help increases.

"The economy becomes an excuse," Katz said. "It increases stress in a family that is already broken."

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights – A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

D.C. Sniper: The real target was to kill wife and take kids. One Shot- one kill.

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights – A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Ex-Wife Of D.C. Sniper: ‘I Was The Enemy’

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113506785

Listen to the Story

Tell Me More

[19 min 20 sec]

Mildred Muhammad

Courtesy Mildred Muhammad

Mildred Muhammad, the ex-wife of the D.C. sniper John Muhammad, has written a book called Scared Silent about domestic violence.

text sizeAAA

October 6, 2009

The ex-wife of the sniper who terrorized the Washington, D.C., area during a 2002 killing spree said the random murders were part of an attempt to commit the perfect crime: to kill her and divert suspicion to a crazed gunman.

Mildred Muhammad says convicted killer John Muhammad began plotting against her after she won custody of their young son and two daughters in 2001. He had told her for years he hated her and accused her of being a bad mother. After the couple separated, he went on the run with the kids, spiriting them away to Antigua for 18 months in 1999.

But she says she never suspected she was the real target of the "Beltway Sniper" until Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents knocked on the door of her Maryland home on Oct. 23, 2002.

Scared Silent
By Mildred Muhammad
Hardcover, 304 pages
Strebor Books, October 2009
List price: $23


Read An Excerpt

"They said, ‘Ms. Muhammad, didn’t you know he was shooting people around you?’ They said, ‘The man he shot in the hand with the laptop, that’s right down the street from you. The gentleman that was shot at the store in Brandywine — that’s two miles away from you. You were the target,’ " Muhammad says.

John Muhammad and a teenage accomplice, Lee Boyd Malvo, went on a shooting spree that left 10 people dead and terrorized residents of Maryland, D.C. and Northern Virginia. Muhammad is scheduled to be executed Nov. 10. Malvo is serving a life sentence.

Mildred Muhammad says her ex-husband thought if she were killed by a crazed gunman, he would regain custody of their children and collect compensation owed them as crime victims. "His end-game scenario was to come in as the grieving father," she says. "He maybe would have been called father of the year."

She says she had known for years her husband wanted to kill her, but no one would listen. For much of their 12-year marriage, Muhammad says, she endured his emotional and mental abuse in silence. But after they separated, she was a marked woman.

Breaking into the house one night, Muhammad says, John woke her with a terrifying message: "You have become my enemy, and as my enemy I will kill you."

Though happy at first, Muhammad says, their marriage changed after he returned from an Army tour during the Gulf War. Well-liked by everyone, he became negative, sullen and paranoid.

She says she didn’t know what caused him to become a monster, but she believes counseling before he returned to civilian life could have averted the rampage.

"I believe what would have made a difference for me is that when John came back from Saudi that he would have been debriefed, and he would have received the counseling that he needed to become a more productive person in a non-war zone," she says.

She tried to alert friends and neighbors to the abuse, but she says no one believed her because she bore no physical scars. Now, she’s telling her story in a new book, Scared Silent, in hopes of helping other victims break their silence and escape abuse.

"Domestic violence is a serious issue that needs to be addressed," she says. "It was my desire to assist other victims and survivors of domestic violence because this was a domestic violence issue."

Reported by Michel Martin and written by Deborah Tedford.

Excerpt: ‘Scared Silent’

by MILDRED MUHAMMAD

'Scared Silent'

Scared Silent
By Mildred Muhammad
Hardcover, 304 pages
Strebor Books, October 2009
List price: $23

Prologue

I could not believe this was happening. The man I married, the man that fathered my children, could not be capable of such a thing. I sat in a hotel room riveted to the television set as images of John flashed across the screen. It was surreal. I walked up to the TV, put my hand on the screen — and whispered, "What happened to you?"

I was a zombie, not the real Mildred, the one who dreamed of simply being a good wife, a good mother and a good servant to God. I had just left a police station where an officer had looked me in the eyes and proclaimed, "Ms. Muhammad, we’re going to name your ex-husband as the sniper."

For months I had looked over my shoulder for two people: John, my ex-husband who had promised to kill me, and "the D.C. sniper," who had terrorized the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area where I lived by randomly killing people. Now I was forced to reconcile that there was only one man — that John, the man who used to cuddle with me at night and fuss over his children during the day, was also the terrorizing gunman.

I remembered what John once told me: "You know I could take a small city and terrorize it and they would think it was a group of people. But it would only be me."

* * *

Still, this was John posturing, wasn’t it? Talking was far different from actually killing. Yet when police asked me if I thought John was capable of doing something like this, I surprised myself by not hesitating for one moment to reply, "Yes."

I knew he could kill. He was a military man and had fought in a war. I also knew that he had promised to kill me because he believed I had taken his children away from him. And I knew John to be a man of his word when it came to a threat or a promise of revenge. Still, over the harrowing months during which one person after another was gunned down by the man labeled as "The D.C. Sniper," not once did I think of John. Not once. It was unfathomable. The sniper had to be a mad man. The sniper had to be inhuman. The sniper had to be like someone I had never known.

Now I was recalling every frightening comment John had ever made to me. He once said, "When a man hits a woman, it means that he has lost all respect for her. It would be easy for him to kill her after that."

But I did not foresee, not even in my wildest nightmare, that John would ever kill people who had nothing to do with me or our troubled marriage.

* * *

I stepped back from the television and realized my son was crying and my daughters were weeping into their pillows. I turned to console them, though I had no idea what to say. I held them close. They were scared. I was too. In the past several hours, we had all learned that John was the sniper suspect and that police were searching for him. Then we had to hurry to pack and police sped us away from our house and to the hotel room where we were being held under police protection.

It is amazing how exhausting trauma can be, even when it is not accompanied by physical blows. The news had pummeled us. My son had nearly passed out when he heard the news. My girls were spent from the weight of one question: How could their father commit such an irreprehensible act?

Once the children went to sleep, I tipped into the bathroom to let go of my own emotions. I had been "the good mother" for my children. I had comforted them until they closed their eyes. I had been the strong shoulder, the consoler. They only had one parent left and they deserved a good one. I turned on the water in the bathtub and faucet so they could not hear me. I sat on the cold floor of the bathroom, buried my face into a pillow and sobbed. I cried for hours, hoping that by daybreak when the children woke, I would be ready for the great unknowing that awaited us.

It was October 23, 2002. It would become a day of demarcation for me and my children. Before this date, my son and daughters were like other children, barely aware of the challenges that adults faced. But after their father was publicly named as the sniper, I watched the light in their eyes grow dimmer. They knew that the worst things were possible. That one day you could be romping in the yard with your parents and on another day you could sit in front of a television set, your heart nearly beating out of your chest, as you watched armed police officers search for your father.

When the person you love becomes the one you fear you are scared to the core of your being. Everything you thought was real has become an illusion. It is disconcerting. You feel as if you are falling into a deep hole and there is nothing to hold onto because everything you thought was there is gone. You slip deeper. And deeper.

John was going to kill me, and now I knew that he had conspired to kill other people just to create a smokescreen. Soon I would learn all the details of how he planned to kill strangers and then shoot me down and have police blame it all on "the D.C. sniper."

But he got caught. Thank God, he got caught.

When the person you love tries to kill you, the pain is unspeakable. How do you explain such an act to anyone? To yourself? What can you possibly say?

I had been a girl with simple dreams. One of my greatest prayers was to be a good wife. Now I thought of the many ways in which John had dismissed me and diminished my existence. I heard his familiar retort, "I don’t mind because you don’t matter."

I was thankful he had not killed me, and I grieved over those whose lives he had taken. I cried for their families, too. But the silencer on John’s gun had silenced me in another way. Shame cut off my tongue. Fear paralyzed my throat. Surely people hated me, I thought. I was the reason innocent people were killed. A bullet did not take my life, but it would be years before I found my voice. Meanwhile, every gentle word I thought of I used to help my children heal. This is what a good mother does.

It took months, even years for my own healing. But now, seven years later — finally — I am no longer scared silent.

Chapter One: First Meetings, First Lies

September 1983 — Baton Rouge

Women who have been involved with abusive men often say that their partners started out being exceptionally attentive and romantic. That was certainly true of John when I first met him. It was on a steamy Labor Day in Louisiana, and I had the day off from my job as a data processor at the State Department of Labor. What I remember most about that lazy Monday morning, except that it was hot, was that I had nothing special to do and nobody to do it with. I was a naive twenty-three-year-old, living a sheltered life at home with my mother. My life revolved around church and work. I was ready to have my own life, as well as a real relationship. I wanted to meet somebody to love; I wanted to meet somebody who would care about me. That morning, my mother was bustling around the kitchen when I went inside to tell her that I was going to the corner store a couple of blocks away. As always, she reminded me, "Just be careful."

I had walked less than half a block when Valena, one of my best friends from high school, passed by in her car and offered me a ride. I certainly could have walked the two blocks, but I was thankful for the company. Valena and I were still close friends. In high school, I was a cheerleader, and she was on the pep squad. We went lots of places together — dances, parties, clubs. It was always fun being with her. Now that we were all grown up, the same thing was true: as soon as we saw each other, it was, "Hey, gurl, wassup?" Valena had another friend in the car, and we began laughing and talking the minute I climbed in. We were three girlfriends who were enjoying a day off in Baton Rouge, listening to songs on our favorite R&B radio station and generally having a good time.

On the way home, Valena said she needed to stop at another store up the street. She pulled into a parking space, and I stayed in the car while she finished her shopping. As I was sitting there, two men came out. One of them, a tall, good-looking brother, wearing sharp blue jeans and a sweatshirt, glanced in my direction. Our eyes locked. I felt vaguely embarrassed and I turned my head so he wouldn’t come over. But, he did. Valena, who was right behind him, began talking to him. Whoa, I thought, she knows him!

"Who’s your friend?" He used his head to gesture in my direction.

"This is Mildred," she told him.

He stuck his head in the driver’s window. "Hi, Mildred," he said. "I’m John. What are you doing tonight?"

I had absolutely nothing to do, but I didn’t want him to know that. My girlfriends and I often talked about how difficult it was to find a good man. Even so, I didn’t want John to know that I was all that available.

That’s why I tried to sound sincere when I said, "I have to check my schedule."

He asked for my number, gave me a beautiful smile, and said he would call later. After he left, Valena had some things to tell me about John. She said that, like us, he had attended Scotlandville High School where he had run track and played tennis. I was a year ahead of him and didn’t recall ever meeting him. Valena dropped me off, and I went inside to think about his smile, which was probably John’s best attribute. When I first met him, he had the kind of smile that everybody noticed; I wasn’t the only one who said that his smile could light up a room.

John called early in the evening as he had promised, and we made a date for eight-thirty. He was at my front door exactly on time. I would quickly learn that he was on time for all of our dates. It was another plus in his favor. When he came in and met my mother, I also couldn’t help noticing how respectful he was. Even more points in his favor. We drove down to a park by the river, a romantic spot filled with other couples doing what we were doing — walking, talking, laughing, sitting on the benches, and giving each other long significant looks. Right away, John told me that he had two sons, but that he wasn’t married.

At one point, he looked me straight in the eyes and said, "I’m looking for someone to share my life."

We were having our first serious conversation, and he asked if I was seeing someone special.

"No," I told him, "I’m just chilling until the right man comes along."

"Well, you’ve found him." John continued to capture me with his gaze.

"Is that right?" I asked.

"Yeah, that’s right." He sounded confident of himself as we both smiled at each other. It felt good to be out with a man who was so quick to express his feelings. John seemed so special. Hey, I thought to myself, finally a "man."

When I asked him what had happened with his ex-girlfriends, he simply said, "Things didn’t work out." He told me that with all the women he had known, after a while, they had done things that made him feel trapped. As soon as he got that feeling, he realized it was time to move on. According to him, he didn’t have anything against marriage; he just didn’t like to feel trapped. I was already intrigued by his thought processes so I asked him what made him feel that way. He told me that if a woman started nagging him or making him feel incompetent, he felt like less than a man. He wanted to be with someone who appreciated him and treated him as though he made a difference. I wanted to please him so I made a mental note never to nag him and to show him that he was appreciated and admired. When we said goodnight, he kissed me on my forehead and told me how much he liked being with me.

The next day he called to check up on me. It was sweet of him, and I told him that right away. He said that I was easy to talk to, and that he hadn’t talked to anybody like he talked to me in a very long time.

"If there is anything I can do for you," he said, "let me know." Then he told me that he wanted to be there for me and that he wanted to make my life easier.

I was shocked that he was so straight with his words. I remember telling him, "You haven’t known me long enough to say those things to me."

He replied, "There is something about you that lets me know that it’s safe for me to talk this way. I know myself well enough to realize that if I can’t do something, then I won’t say it. If it comes out of my mouth, then I’m obligated to make it happen."

That sounded good to me. "Oh, then you’re a man of his word, right?"

"That’s right," he answered, "I’m a man of my word."

And that’s how our relationship started. From my inexperienced point of view, John was wonderful. He used all the right words and said everything I wanted to hear, but I was at a disadvantage: my ideas of how a man should behave in a relationship were all romanticized and based on television, movies, and hearsay. My father left my mother when I was four, and I had no relationship with him whatsoever. I don’t even remember meeting anybody from his side of the family. In the last few years, I’ve thought a lot about what it means for a girl to grow up as I did. I’ve wondered whether the absence of a father image made me more vulnerable to somebody like John.

When I was growing up, my mother was the stable center of our universe. She supported the family by cleaning houses and working in restaurants. Any memories I have of my father are buried too deep to recall. There was only one family picture in the house with my dad in it. He was holding me and standing with two of my sisters next to him. But something must have happened when the photograph was being taken because his face didn’t come out; it’s just like a shiny blank. Everything I know about my father comes from what other people told me. Everybody said that he was tall, handsome, dark-skinned, and the life of the party; they also told me that he was a real ladies’ man. My mother liked to tell me that I was his favorite baby girl, but I don’t know if that was really true. Mama could have been telling me that to make me feel good about myself.

I was one of five children; my mother had my three older sisters and then it was nine more years before I was born. I also have a brother who is two years younger. My sisters were pretty much all teenagers or out of the house by the time I was old enough to retain many memories. When I was about nine, my father died. Even though we didn’t know him, my brother and I went to the funeral with my mom and sisters. My father’s body was in a closed casket with a United States flag draped over it. I looked for a photograph so I could see what my father looked like, but there wasn’t one. My brother and I were sitting together; the only question was which one of us was going to cry first. We were told that dad died in an accident in the Navy, but later, when I was about twenty, I was at another funeral with my mother, and I overheard some of my father’s old friends talking. That’s how I found out the truth. My father had died in a fire, and I guess you could say that he was also a victim of domestic violence. It seemed he and my mother were separated at the time and he was having problems with his current girlfriend who must have thought, if I can’t have him, then neither will anybody else. While my father was asleep, his girlfriend padlocked the doors and windows on the outside of the small house in which they were living and set it on fire. My father’s friends said that you could hear my dad screaming for miles while the house was burning. They said they came with axes to try to get him out, but they couldn’t get to him because the heat from the fire was so intense. I feel terrible thinking about it even now. Just a few months ago, my sister found a photograph of my father, taken when he was nineteen. It was the first time I saw a picture of him. I began crying and couldn’t stop for about three hours.

It was tough on my mother, living alone with young children to raise. She wanted better things for us, and she would have done anything to help her children. She struggled hard to pay the bills, but we managed. We were always in school; there was always home-cooked food on the table; and there was always love. My mother, who was one of fourteen children, came from a large religious Southern Baptist family. Her brother was a pastor and my uncle’s church was a big part of our lives. We attended Sunday school as well as every service; my mother, brother, and I all sang in the choir. My mother always gave me two pieces of advice: "Live as near right as you can." And "Live as close to God as you can."

Some people complain about their mothers saying they never got enough love. With me and my mother, it was the opposite. If anything, she loved me too much. She never wanted me to move away from her, get married, or have children. After finishing high school, I had attended Southern University for two and a half years, studying to get a degree in Computer Science, but I couldn’t afford to continue. I had to drop out, get some quick technical training, which I did in data entry, and find a job so I could help my mother with the finances of the house.

I had wanted to go into the military, but my mom talked me out of it because she didn’t want me that far away and she worried that I could get hurt. She said that people used to tell her to have children, but that nobody had ever told her how to let go. As far as she was concerned, the hardest part of mothering was letting her children grow up.

Soon after I met John, he told me some things about his childhood, and it sounded like he had never had anybody at all that he could depend on. John came from New Orleans, one of six children — three boys and three girls — but his father left all of them, when John was still very young, to start a new family and never looked back. John was always bitter that his father had abandoned the family, but the greatest tragedy of his early childhood was the loss of his mother, who died from breast cancer. He told me that he was five when his mother died, but I’ve heard reports from other family members saying that he was as young as two. The one thing everyone agrees about is that he and his mother were extremely attached and that she was holding him when she died. I don’t think he ever got over his mother’s death and he carried that sadness with him wherever he went. The image of him as a little boy in the arms of his dying mother also stayed in my mind. In our marriage, it was always hard for me to stay angry at him — no matter what he did — knowing what he had gone through.

After his mother’s death, he and his brothers and sisters went to live with relatives in Baton Rouge. He didn’t like to talk about what happened to him while he was growing up, except to say that they were mentally and physically abused by various adults in the family. He told me that he and his siblings tried to take care of each other as best they could. When I was reading about John’s trial in the paper, it was reported that one of the people who hit him regularly was an uncle who was once accused of beating another child to death. John was a proud man who didn’t like to appear vulnerable or have anybody feel sorry for him so the issue of his childhood abuse was not a topic he wanted to discuss.

People often ask me how he behaved when I met him and whether he seemed controlling, moody, or insecure, and I have to answer that he seemed much calmer and more stable than most people, but I had no real understanding then of his well-developed acting skills. Even so, he had a strong presence. Everything I heard the men in my family say a man should be, I saw in John. He had a steady job, and he was a member of the National Guard. He was a strong man with a strong handshake, and he appeared to walk tall. He was also extremely romantic, loving, and gentle with me. During his trial, I read newspaper reports of testimony from a woman he was dating in the last years of our marriage; she also described him in glowing terms as being gentle, considerate, and strong. Of course, during the early years of our relationship, I thought his loving words were all for me, but he was always exceptionally good with women. If he wanted something from a woman, he knew exactly what to say and how to say it.

Those times that he let his guard down, he did appear lonely and like he needed somebody to love him. I remember him telling me that in his life, it was as though anyone who had ever cared about him wanted something from him. I was touched by his sadness, especially about the death of his mother. I was sure I could make a difference in his life. I wanted to show him how love looks and feels when it is genuine. I wanted him to know that I cared about him for who he was and not because of what he could give me. I promised myself that I wasn’t going to disappoint or abandon him.

From John’s history, one might have expected him to act gloomy and depressed, but back in 1983, nothing could be further from the truth. The John I fell in love with was primarily a lighthearted man who liked to have fun. He would do things like pick me up from work and start driving in an unexpected direction. I would ask, "Where are we going?" He would point to the back, and I would see the fishing poles. We would head on down under the old Mississippi River Bridge where we would throw our lines in near the support beams. After we caught the fish, we took it to my house, cleaned it, fried it, and ate it. It was pretty good. Nights we would go dancing or to the movies or just hang out. On the weekends, we would go to the park, museum, or zoo. Sometimes one or both of his sons would be with him; anybody could see how devoted he was to his boys and how much they loved him.

At first even my mother liked and appreciated John and would make him special things to eat. My mother, who really knew her way around a kitchen, could whip up all kinds of food and make it better than just about anybody else. I think she tried to make John feel at home because he was so respectful of her. If he wanted peach cobbler, she made peach cobbler; if he wanted pound cake, she made pound cake. In return he did little repairs around our house. He was always extremely skillful with his hands and could fix just about anything. We had some pipes under the house that were leaking, and he promised my mother that he would come over and fix them. He showed up right on time, crawled under the house, and started working. I crawled right after him and became his assistant. I loved that I could count on him to do whatever he promised to do. When I told him how much I appreciated that quality, he told me that he would always be that way, saying, "I never want you to lose that sparkle in your eyes when you look at me."

About two months into our relationship, I decided that I was going to go over to visit Valena, who I really hadn’t seen since Labor Day. It was a warm day and I wanted to go for a walk.

"So, how’s John doing?" she asked almost as soon as I walked through the door.

"He’s doing well," I told her. "And our relationship is GREAT!"

Valena looked at me and breathed in and out, before she told me what she had found out. "Well, you know he’s married, right?"

I remember saying things like, "What?" and "Ah man!!" and "What am I going to do now?!!!"

Valena asked me how I really felt about him, and I told her, "I love him, but he never said anything about any wife. He just told me he had two sons."

"Yes," Valena agreed, "he has two sons by two different women, and he married the last one."

I felt as though somebody had kicked me in the stomach. How could this be happening? How could this be true? I was totally confused. John and I were together all the time, and I had seen no signs of a wife; he didn’t seem like he had anything to hide; he had even given me his phone number, although of course I never used it and waited for him to call me. But he never seemed to have any obligation to any other woman. He didn’t seem to be worried about being seen with me. What was going on?

Before I left Valena that day, she said to me, "Well, Mildred, you’ve got a decision to make."

All I could think about was that decision and what I was going to say to John. I went to church regularly and all those "Thou Shalt Nots" and other messages about adultery began to flash in my brain.

When John called that night and greeted me with his usual, "Hi, Sweetheart," all I could think was,John has a wife, but I was so upset I could barely speak, let alone ask him about his lies. He asked if he could come over, but I was too hurt to see him. I told him I had to help my mother with something. He asked me if I needed anything and I said no.

"Okay, honey," he said, "I’ll talk to you tomorrow." Then he paused and used those three little words that every woman in love wants to hear: "I love you."

It was the first time he had said that to me. I said, "I love you, too."

Then I hung up the phone and burst into tears. I realized what I had to do, but I didn’t know if I could do it.

That night I tossed and turned and couldn’t sleep. At work the following day, I was a mess. Instead of doing what I was supposed to be doing, I thought about all the things I wanted to say to John about why our relationship had to end, and I wrote them all down on a piece of paper so I wouldn’t forget what I wanted to say. I put the paper in my purse and was trying to get back to work when the phone rang. It was John.

"Hi, Tinker Bell," he said. Tinker Bell was a nickname he used for me because he said I was so little and cute. I called him "Sweetie" because he was so sweet to me.

"Hey, Sweetie."

"Just checking to make sure you have a smile on your face," he said.

I started looking for the paper on which I’d written down what I wanted to say to him, but I couldn’t find it fast enough, so I put the conversation off once again, all the while knowing that I was getting in deeper and deeper. He told me again that he loved me and he wanted me to remember that while I was working. Then he asked, "Do you love me?"

"Yes." I couldn’t deny it.

He said, "That’s all I needed to hear."

In the meantime, I was thinking, man, what am I going to do now?

When I got home, my mom looked at me funny as though she knew something was wrong, but I didn’t want to tell her because I didn’t want John to look bad. He called soon after I got home and told me that he wouldn’t accept any excuses and that he was coming over. We went to the park because he said he had something he wanted to say to me and didn’t want any distractions. I think I expected him to tell me about his wife and family, but I wanted to get out what I had to say first. Almost as soon as we sat down on a bench, I started talking and told him that I found out that he was married and that I was trying to find a way to end our relationship.

He said, "Please don’t do that. You are the best thing that has happened to me in a long time and I can’t go back to living without you."

I cried and told him that I was sure that what we were doing went against everything I believed. I also didn’t want to be in this situation because I wouldn’t want anybody to do this to me if I were married.

He was persistent. He pleaded with me, "Mildred, please don’t throw me away. We can work this out." He told me that he wasn’t happy in his marriage and neither was his wife. He said that they were simply going through the motions and it was only a matter of time before it would be over. He asked, "Can you please wait for me and not get involved with anyone else? I promise, I will not let you down."

"How much time?" As I asked that question, I knew the direction in which I was headed. I didn’t want to lose him.

In retrospect, I can’t help but notice how little anger I had toward him for lying to me.

My girlfriends and I were sort of indoctrinated to believe that men could do what they wanted and that a cheating man was not the same thing as a cheating woman. As long as the man was bringing the money home and taking care of the bills, everything else should be excused and forgiven. The woman was expected to keep quiet, cook, clean, take care of the children, and not cause any problems. So when I heard about John’s marriage, I almost felt sorry for him because his wife wasn’t giving him what he needed. I also felt tremendous guilt because I was helping him deceive another woman. But I didn’t really blame him or get angry at him. They say that love is blind and that explains my state. I still thought of him as my knight-in-shining-armor, and the glare coming off of that armor blinded me.

It didn’t take much for him to convince me that, even if I didn’t want to be in a romantic relationship with him, we could still be platonic "friends." That same night, almost as soon as we came to that agreement, he had a favor to ask in the name of friendship. My mind was focused on his being married, but he had a different agenda that he was promoting.

He said, "I have something else I want you to know."

"What?" I asked. From the pained look on his face, I worried that he was going to say something really horrible. I was bracing myself. Could he be dying? What kind of confession was he going to make?

"I can’t read." He looked uncomfortable as he told me. He then related an incredible story about having been in an accident and having lost his memory. According to him, he had recovered from his accident, but his memory of how to read was completely gone. His confession made me feel almost relieved because it was nowhere near as horrible as what I had anticipated. I also immediately realized that he was offering me a role in his life — one that would allow us to stay connected, even if we were no longer romantically involved.

I asked him some questions about the reading like, "Are you serious?" and "Does anyone know?"

He said he hadn’t told anybody but me, explaining, "Everyone expects me to know things, and if they found out I can’t read, they wouldn’t understand, or they would laugh at me." He seemed sad and hurt; it was obvious that he was embarrassed.

John had graduated from high school so I asked him how he had accomplished that without being able to read. He told me that he had developed a photographic memory. If he needed to learn something, he would find some excuse to ask a friend to read it aloud to him. He said he told people that things sounded better when they were read out loud. He would memorize what he had heard and floated through school by memorizing everything.

I questioned him, "You’ve done all this just to survive?"

"Yes," he answered, "But it’s getting old, and I need help."

He asked me if I could facilitate him learning to read. That’s how our relationship changed from girlfriend/boyfriend to teacher/student. I soon discovered that he wasn’t joking when he said he couldn’t read, so we started with basics like "See Spot Run." I even took a phonics class at night so I would be better equipped to teach him.

We spent a lot of time meeting at the local library, as well as the library at Southern University campus. We worked hours at a time, and I would give him lots of spelling tests. It was tough going at first and required patience from both of us, but eventually we got past basic reading texts and moved on to newspapers, magazines, and books. Before long, he was really reading, and it opened his eyes to new possibilities for his life. Helping him with the reading and seeing the results was very exciting to me.

When we met, John was a sergeant in the National Guard and spent at least one weekend a month doing his service and training. He wanted to be in the regular military, but I think his literacy issues were holding him back. He worried that people would not respect him if they discovered his secret. As his reading and writing improved, he began to talk about leaving Baton Rouge. He thought that the best way for him to get ahead in life would be through the armed services. In order to get accepted, he had to take a battery of tests. He asked me to help him study for his military tests, and I did it happily. Yes, there was still a romantic undercurrent between us, but we both concentrated on his learning. If he called me at work, it was as likely to be a question about his attempts to figure out phonics and sound out a new word as anything else.

During these many months that we studied together, John continued to make a point of assuring me that he needed me in his life and nothing was going to stop him from letting me know that. We sometimes discussed his marital status, which I viewed as a serious problem. He continued to ask me to wait. I was trying to get some distance between us and would often back away emotionally; he hated it when I did that. In the meantime, he would also try to do things for me. Once when I was short of money, he offered to help me out. I asked if he was taking from his family to give to me, and he said no, he had plenty.

The give and take between us made me feel as though we were becoming good friends. John also began to confide in me in other ways. During the time we were romantically involved, he assured me that were no other women, but he also told me that there had been other women and explained how he would arrange their names and phone numbers in codes he made up so his wife wouldn’t figure it out. I remember thinking, "I don’t want to be part of a harem." I recognized his behavior as being sneaky, but I didn’t think it was a basic weakness in his character. Instead I made excuses for him; I thought he would be different if he were in a good relationship. I assumed he was trying to fill a void because he needed love and wasn’t getting it. I didn’t see his behavior with women as indicative of larger issues.

Once he passed his test and was accepted into the Army, I cut off communication with him. I still felt extremely guilty that our relationship could be hurting his wife. It had been close to two years since we had met, and there he was, still married. Some people come into our lives for a lifetime; others are only there for a reason and a season. As far as I was concerned, my reason and my season were up. I suggested that he devote more time to getting things straight with his wife so that she could go with him wherever he would be stationed. He suggested that I go with him, and I said that I didn’t think that would work; especially since he was still married. I told him to keep studying. I told him that I loved him; and I backed off, way off.

The day that he was leaving for basic training, I wanted so badly to phone him and say goodbye. But we had decided to let the relationship go, and I didn’t want to make it worse. I spent November 5, 1985, his departure day, in my room crying. I woke up thinking about John and I went to bed thinking about John. I wondered what he was doing and how he was doing, and I wondered whether he missed me as much as I missed him.

Less than a month later, on December 1st, I received a letter from him, along with a one-way ticket to Fort Lewis, WA. The letter said that he couldn’t continue in his marriage any longer and he wanted me by his side. He said he was willing to do whatever he had to do for us to be together. One of the best things about the letter was that every word was spelled correctly.

Reprinted from Scared Silent by Mildred Muhammad by arrangement with Strebor Books, Copyright 2009

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights – A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Mildred D. Muhammad, Executive Director, After the Trauma- Battered Wife of DC Sniper John Muhammad

 

Video from the The Sixth Annual Battered Mothers Custody
Conference: Albany New York 2009

Mildred D. Muhammad, Executive Director, After the Trauma

(the DC sniper- Wife and Family Survives)

 

Courageous Kids Carly Singer FL – and Selene Muhammad

After the TraumaHelping Survivors of Domestic Violence Re-Establish Their Lives

Contact
A SurvivorProgramsAssistanceNews
DonateResources

About Mildred Muhammad

Mildred Muhammad

Mildred Muhammad is a domestic violence survivor with a story to tell the world.

Many know her first and foremost by her former husband, John Allen Muhammad – the convicted DC sniper who terrorized the Washington DC metro region in late 2002. However, many are not aware that the reasons for the horrific attacks on innocent women, children and men in the DC Metro area, originated from John Allen Muhammad’s stalking and the control tactics he used on Mildred, his former wife, whom he sought to find and kill before, during and after the divorce.

After almost five years of silence, Mildred speaks openly about her day-to-day experiences as a survivor of domestic violence and how it affected her three children.

It is not just "a" story – it is "one of the many" stories built on the experiences of domestic violence and the depths of its terror. After her children were kidnapped and having to face her daily reality of living without them, she began the silent struggle of looking for them, knowing that if she exposed herself, John Allen Muhammad would locate her and kill her. She was determined in her struggle to get through those 18 months of not knowing where her children were by filing the necessary legal documents "pro se" and being prepared for the time she would gain full custody of them. She never gave up hope! After they were found and the judge awarded the children to her, she fled from her former husband and moved to Maryland with her children. She was terrified during the horrific sniper shootings while looking for John and the sniper! After finding out that John and the sniper were the same person, she was subpoenaed to be present at court proceedings during the trials, and last but not least, began re-gaining her strength to start a non-profit organization.

Keeping her promise within herself to help other survivors and with her own personal funds, Mildred began After The Trauma, Inc., as the Founder/Executive Director. She is striving to enlighten more people that you don’t have to have physical scars to be a victim/survivor of domestic violence while working with victims/survivors that come to the organization for assistance. She speaks publicly as a means to get the information out to the public on ways to help survivors after their domestic violence experiences. She is not only speaking to survivors directly, but helps them through their individual situations. She is always available for those who need her most, because she understands, first hand what it feels like to be a victim and a survivor fo domestic violence. She publishes and archives a monthly newsletter on the organization’s website and sends it to those on the organization’s mailing list.

"Sometimes it is just not enough to hear the words that someone truly understands the situation and is asking you to “hold” or “wait” – this is the powerful difference in knowing first hand what needs to be offered to domestic violence survivor from a domestic violence survivor,” says Mildred Muhammad.

After The Trauma, non-profit’s mission is to provide assistance to domestic violence survivors. Through nine programs from mentoring and education to transportation – After The Trauma creates a way to help survivors face their next day, and an even greater need to rebuild their lives.

"Our primary objective is creating a place to house their growing needs. I believe we can make a difference to these women and their children. It starts one day at a time …the tragic stories would alarm anyone … but I understand, because I’ve lived through it… and I want to help the survivors through it,” says Muhammad.

Most importantly, she has three teenagers that remind her everyday that the promises of God are true!


Awards

Carolyn Washington, Executive Director of Sisters 4 Sisters, Inc., awarded her with the 2008 Circle of Grace Honors Award for her work in domestic violence

Cindy Dyer, Director, Office on Violence Against Women honored her with a Special Commendation for her extraordinary contribution to the prevention of domestic violence and in appreciation for her committment to the mission of the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice

Roslyn Bacon, Executive Director of Jonah Village, Inc, in Brooklyn, NY, honored her with the 2008 Shirley Chisholm Woman of Courage Award

Chuck Paris of No Jurisdictional Boundaries honored her and After The Trauma, Inc, with the Leadership Courage Award


She was interviewed on Good Morning America with Charlie Gibson, appeared on BET and other TV interviews. She has also been interviewed by interent blog radio, various newspapers, internet blogs and magazines, to include the Washington Post and Newsweek. She has spoken on various syndicated radio shows. CNN has aired the documentary titled, “The Minds of the Sniper”. She was interviewed by Soledad O’Brien for the documentary. TruTV has aired the documentary “The DC Sniper’s Wife” by award winning film producer Barbara Kopple’. Both documentaries re-air in different locations at different times of the year.

She is a consultant with the Office for Victims of Crime and is a board member of different domestic violence organizations. She has become a "National Spokesperson" for domestic violence and has been honored as being the keynote speaker, telling her story for several conferences regarding domestic violence. She shares her expertise on what it’s like being a victim and a survivor of domestic violence without physical scars to victims and survivors of domestic violence, advocates, law enforcements, therapists, counselors, mental health providers, medical health providers, various universities and many others.

She is currently writing her book, ‘Scared Silent’, which will be released October 2009 by Simon and Schuster. She has also written a working journal, ‘A Survivor’s Journal’ specifically for victims and survivors to help with those anxieties that others may not understand which is available on the organization’s website. The responses from those who have ordered the journal have been overwhelming.

Learn more about Mildred Muhammad

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Posted in : Child Abuse, Crime, Families, Juvenile Crime, Murder,, Abuse, Abused Children, Abuser, Don Hoffman FR Layer Topeka Kansas, Hal Richard, Activism, Best interest of children, Best interest of the child, Best interest of the children, California, Call to action, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Children and Domestic Viol, Amy Leitchberg, Angry fathers, Anne Grant, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Battered Mothers Custody Conference-Battered Women, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, CIVIL RIGHTS, CPS, Child Abuse, Child Custody Issues Battered Women, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Do, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence, Family Court Reform, Family Courts, Family Rights, Human Rights,Husbands who murder wives, Intimate Partner, Child Custody-, Child found,, Children's rights, Cohersive Control, Genocide Battered Women, Collin Momany, Phoenix, Arizona, Corrupt bastards, Crisis in America's Family Courts, Curt and Christi Brungardt, Custody Hell, Custody scam the lizlibrary, Dead,Apparent,Double,Murder,Suicide,Texas,, Domestic Law, Domestic Violence, Domestic Violence on rise in shawnee county, Don Hoffman, Dr. David Rodehheffer, Topeka Court Whore, Erin, Family Anilhition-the killers are fathers, Family Violence, GOVERNMENT OPPRESSION, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Governor sebelius, Hal Richardson wife beater child abuser topeka kansas, Human Rights, Industry of abuse, Jana Mackey, Jason Hoffman, Court Appointed Child Abusers, Jessica Gonzales, Castle Rock, CO- Inter-American Commission Human Rights-Violence Against women, Judge, Judge Punishs Mom for not following Orders of Abuse, Judge david 'death' Debenham, Jurror 13, Jurror Thirteen, www.EyesForJustice.com,, KS -Outraged जुद्गेस, KS protective parent reform act, KTKA49 News, Jessica Drew, Domestic Violence Topeka, KU Basketball, Kansas NOW Lobbyist, Kansas University, Knoxville, Little hostages, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Nazi America, Human Expieriments, Mother of Murdered Children Speaks, Amy Castillo, Motherhood, Mothers Rights, Myers, OUTRAGEOUSE, Odysseey Group Topeka Kansas a perps BEST FRIEND, Odyssey KS Drex Flott MSW, Odyssey KS Kara Haney MS, Over,homicide,victims,attacker,tools,behavior,relations, PAS- Perpetrators Aligning Strategically, Parental Alienation=Pepetrators Aligning Stategiaclly, Proclamation Day, Reform Family Courts, Shared Parenting, Batterer women dead children,, Speak Out, Susan Murphy Milano, Maternal Deprivation, System abuse, Torture Shared Parenting, PAS PAS PAS, Un-Justice System, Washburn University, affair, children-need-both-parents, contempt, custody, death, domestic-violence-awareness,, family court corruption, fathers rights-abusers rights, fees, guardian, homicide, human trafficking, jill dykes court appointed child abuser, judicial corruption, legal kidnapping, logic, lover, murder murder domestic violence fatalaties, orders, parent, parental alienation =perps aligning strategically, profiting, psychiatrist, theraputic jurisprudence, whores of the court, whores of the court, the falling of abusers rights,, • CUSTODY ISSUES FALSE ALLEGATIONS FAMILY COURT FEMICIDE MURDER-SUICIDE UNCATEGORIZED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Leave a Comment »

My gut reaction to more news of a fathering court. (Let’sGetHonestBlog)

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Family ‘Lawless’ Court Whores.

Permalink

Let’sGetHonestBlog

Not a Private Matter – Why "Family" "Law" System Hurts Us All

My gut reaction to more news of a fathering court.

leave a comment »

It takes but a few moments of passion for a man to start a child.

Between funding of abstinence education, healthy marriage initiatives, fatherhood initiatives, a fantastic public school system (USA), trailing the industrialized world in several core topics, like reading and math, and rampant crime inside and outside the schools, between initiatives preventing parents from knowing whether or not a teen daughter has gone to have an abortion on school time, and so forth — PERHAPS with this, and of course the help of the child support system — and fathering courts–

We might find a few good men with moral integrity and empathy for the welfare of their offspring.

Or is it– according to this plan — make some, evidently.

I add my sarcastic comments just so the text doesn’t blithely slip down reader’s gullets and a  warm fuzzy feeling about the nobility of this enterprise get assimilated into the thinking system.

Then again, what you assimilate is your choice.  When you read, remember that every Court Commissioner, Defense prosecutor, and public prosecutor mentioned is, I would think, on public dole also.  Welcome to the OK Corral..

http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-story-daddy-do-over-110609,0,5997057.story
Jackson County Pioneers Missouri Move to Fathering Courts
John Holt, edited by Jason Vaughn
November 6, 2009

KANSAS CITY, MO – Kevin Gainey was on top of the world. A good job as a bail bondsman, a lake home, and custody of his young son following his divorce.

{{FUNNY, I thought there was gender bias against men in family courts.  That’d be an interesting  case to look up. . . . Maybe  Mom must have abused substances, abandoned children, been a slut and was off with another man, or simply a stay at home Mom who was financially outclassed somehow.   Maybe she was a working Mom and he was a stay at home father?   Or, maybe she just gave them to him, not being financially independent and called that a good deal.  Or perhaps she was not emotionally connected to her son.  There are a thousand reasons this father, not mother, may have gotten custody of his son after a divorce, all of which might be relevant to the story, and shed a different light on the situations, and the wisdom — or lack of it — of whichever judge decided to allocate custody of his son to a Dad.  Boys should be with fathers {{no matter the character…}} was maybe the thinking, I guess.  H OW OLD was the son?  Who had been previous caretaker?  Was his former Mom a stay at home Mom?  Was the divorce contested or amicable?  What was that background story???}}

But bad habits caught up with him, his son moved back with his mom, and Gainey lost his job.

{{“bad habits caught up with him.”  Yeah, let’s gloss over that aspect.

Poor fellow, couldn’t run fast enough.  Was it meth, crack, heroin, alcohol, pornography, — WHAT bad habits.  No matter, poor dear, he couldn’t outrun himself..

Also, I note, “moved BACK with his Mom,” meaning, she had custody, then lost it.  Maybe not.  But if so, Gee, sound familiar, folks? — except the actually getting to move back with Mom part…}}

“Wasn’t always accountable for my actions,” Gainey now says. “A lot of it had to do with my substance abuse problem.”

{{So what did the rest of it have to do with??}}

{{Externalizes the problem –  I am so familiar with this language pattern!  Not his fault, still..}}

{{Notice he didn’t say:  I wasn’t always accountable, I abused substances (and which one[s])..and “I hurt my son” }}with what ramifications…was it endangering his son most likely?  What was he doing to support his “bad habits” and “substance abuse” problem that caused a radical custody switch?)

With no money, doing odd jobs, and a sobriety issue {{SO it was alcohol…}}, Gainey fell behind in his child support, and wound up facing criminal charges.

{{Again poor dear, he was drinking, making holding a job difficult– apparently AFTER he lost custody of his son, as child support was involved.  I say apparently, because I don’t know for sure, but it seems likely…}}

Despite that, prosecutors deemed him a good candidate for a diversion program that could give Gainey a fresh start and keep him out of prison: fathering court.

{{FORMULA:  State & Court order child support.  Child support not paid.  This is contempt of a law, and a quasi-criminal situation that can land a parent in jail, the purpose of which is to communicate that child support is a serious issue and to be paid.  However, there’s a way to dilute that message that child support IS for children, IS important, and that neglecting it IS negligence, when the potential to pay exists (i.e., stop drinking, and instead work, or at least seek work….  get help yourself…)

Enter — voila! —

{{FATHERING COURT, LAUNCHED 1998}}

((Somehow, I sense as systemic setup — do you?))  ((My blog talks about the Father’s Resolutions passed in 1998 & 1999 in US Congress, and posts some links and excerpts of the horror that XX% of African American children are sleeping in homes without their fathers in them nationwide, and how Congress can stop the is travesty….

Note:  The 15 yr old girl gang raped, with passersby, in Richmond, CA recently had a father in the home.  He just wasn’t at the door leaving the dance to get her.  The victim, and it’s STILL no excuse, but she was 15 and inhaled a good deal of alcohol first.  She had a father.  Must have been a statistical anomaly.  Meanwhile, in another state here, to protect young sons (like the one exposed to substance abuse, above) and the young daughters (like the one whose  currently devastated Dad, I’m sure, did NOT show up needy and underemployed in a fathering court, apparently) we need MORE, not LESS< “therapeutic jurisprudence.”

In fact, let’s actually just SKIP the jurisprudence part (except for the labels on the door) and go straight to therapy, just CALLING it “court.”

Gag me with a spoon.. . .Or show me the up and coming “mothering” courts.  No one gives us that rope, that I’ve seen!

It will not change the wheels of the institutions — we still need more fathering intervention nationwide, and grants to fund them, and to alter the philosophical basis of law to accommodate a “required outcome” of more father-contact, and to bribe, cajole, coach, and help men  to understand they must actually help FEED those they BREED.

Launched in 1998, Jackson County’s fathering court is modeled after its drug court: parents, most often dads {{Well, THAT”s a shocker….}}, get help meeting the challenges that may be holding them back through an initial screening. Regular follow-up court appearances are designed to keep them on track.

“I think that’s the role of fathering court. To identify the barriers that are preventing payment of support, and then to direct them to the services that resolve those issues,” says Family Court Commissioner Patrick Campbell, himself a father of two.

Commissioner Campbell presides over the court which meets weekly in Division 43.

{{Let me get this straight:  He presides over this court, presumably making decisions and signing court orders affecting men, women, and their mutual children, and THINKS he understands its purpose?  Does this Commissioner have a law degree in any state?}}

{{Are there any actual rules of court which apply in this situation?  By the way, people have a right to be heard by a judge, not a commissioner, if they choose, or so I heard.  I suppose that’s not highly publicized over there…}}

On a recent morning it was a crowded docket, as Commissioner Campbell greeted men who must demonstrate that they are making progress, make some kind of regular payment toward child support, and attend a 12 week parenting class.

{{Yes, there’s no problem on earth that a good parenting class can’t solve.  }}

“Congratulations”, Campbell tells one dad. “I told you when you graduated and got a job I was going to raise you up a little bit. So I’m going to raise each of them to 150 a month.”

To another dad, the commissioner urges contact with his kids: **”These three kids have one dad and you’re it,” he tells the man, who admits he hasn’t seen his children much.

**I am a mother.  I am having to fight pretty damn hard for contact with my kids, and there’s not one court commissioner, court-appointed attorney, mediator, judge or any one else assisting me.  But because I wasn’t abusing substances and in trouble with the law, there were no “services” offered to help.  In fact, when I went seeking them — after child-stealing on an overnight– they weren’t found.  Period.  If anything, these courts were resisting.  I didn’t understand this fully til, again, I looked up the “Access Visitation” grants system and “REQUIRED OUTCOME” for grant recipients.  You can research this, too — my blog, others, or the internet.  THAT’s what this is about.  NOT the kids…

To other men he’s a cheerleader, a task master, a coach, urging some to get something as simple as an email address so they can receive job listings sent to them by the program.

“You try to make a quick decision as to whether this is a time to encourage them or is this a time to push ‘em where they’re not comfortable,” Campbell says later.

{{I am so sorry to find that the public servants in this country feel the need to parent parents, and have forgotten their assigned duties and oaths of office (for those who are also attorneys).  The President of the USA had to swear an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution.  This includes due process, and laws.  What’s up with this crowd?  ???}}

A prosecutor and defense attorney stand at the bench with each of the dads, but unlike other settings, they appear more like a team, working with, rather than against each other in a court where there is no court reporter, and nothing is on the record.

{{WOW.  That’s wonderfully reassuring that all decisions will be ethical, fair, not subject to any forms of bribery or kickback, and protect the interests of the children involved, and the rest of the society not to have to pick up the tab….}}

“They see that we’re all trying to help them get to where they need to be,” says prosecutor Rebecca Leavett, who calls fathering court her favorite docket. “And I think they get more relaxed and trust us, they open up to us more about the issues that are actually going on in their lives.”

{{Translation:  some of them can be disarmingly open — when there’s money at stake.  I am so glad that the prosecutor and the defense attorneys — in an adversarial system designed for the truth to come out, through due process, and fair judgments be made — are in truth not even PRETENDING to do “bad cop, good cop,” but admitting that it’s all a show.  . . . . . .   }}

{{I”m so glad that these hardened attorneys get to have some moments of warm fuzzy feelings of do-goodism.  Perhaps the single mothers (if applicable) and fatherless children can take that warm fuzzy feeling and serve it up hot for dinner, or hug it as a pillow on a cold night.  Perhaps those attorneys might want to empathize with those not actually present in court, in their warm fuzziness on the law…and accountability…. AA for effort, eh??  }}

Her counterpart agrees.

“This isn’t a time for secrets, this isn’t a time for somebody to come up and say ‘whoa that’s attorney-client privilege, I want to keep this between me and my attorney,” says Gaurika Anand, a public defender who works with most of the dads.

Along with court transcripts, adversarial process designed to elicit truth, we now also want to do away with attorney-client privilege.  Gee, I wonder what ELSE is on the docket here??

Are the sons and daughters of these child-support-deprived kids going to grow up realizing, as their Dads now have, that it’s not actual performance, but just a public effort, that actually counts in life?  We can’t expect real standards based on real needs, after all….

I say this as a teacher, most of my adult professional life.  I know that failing to make standards clear, and then get a consensus to excell at reaching them – accomplishment and stretching those standards upwards by effort (not bribery…) produces the warm fuzzy feelings.  Not cheating them by constantly reducing the bottom line…}}

This year, Missouri lawmakers saw the eleven year old Jackson County court as a good model, and approved the concept statewide. So far several circuit courts have expressed interest, but there’s little money for launching new fathering courts. A state court spokesman says it’s expected the concept will eventually spread when the state’s economy improves.

Gainey is just happy he had the concept to benefit from in Jackson County. Initially reluctant to attend the parenting classes, he eventually did, and is grateful for the opportunity. He’s slowly whittling down his $17,000 back child support bill, has attended rehab, and says he’s now sober and working toward a better life.

When Gainey and other dads graduate, the criminal non-support charges are gone, so long as they continue to work to pay down their child support debt.

“There’s no way I could disrespect the opportunity family court’s given me,” he says. “This is gonna’ happen.”

That’s what Commissioner Campbell wants to hear from more of his participating dads.

“In this court you actually see people make changes.” he says. “I would never tell you it would be all of those making changes, but you see a lot of people make primary fundamental changes in their life. And that’s a very encouraging thing to see.”

__._,_.___

When you mix this scenario in with domestic violence, just know that economic abuse is a common factor.  While I’m VERY jaundiced, there’s a reason –  my personal experience, which is not unique, as a mother, watching the impact of sporadic child support payments, the NONresponse of the system to do anything about it when I worked and invested diligent time to get them to (and involved others).  When the children lived with me, it stalled, delayed, obstructed, and gave me double-talk answers to direct questions.    This affected my children, and my relationship with them.

The second the custody switch happened, this same system that would NOT move for a single mother, went aggressively to bat for a father who’d just responded to my attempts to collect by snatching the kids!

This will all come out in the wash eventually.  Warm fuzzies (I don’t share them, in this matter) in one place don’t compensate for hungry children elsewhere.

For those new to these posts — the OCSE (That’s federal Office of Child Support Enforcement) are administering the grants to the states for increasing noncustodial parent (translation:  FATHERS) involvement with their kids through mandated mediation, parenting plans, and other issues designed to –    I hate to keep repeating this truth, but it’s the truth– diverting the evidence and fact-finding process from OUTSIDE The courtroom (and off the record — see this above case!) — to court paraprofessionals whose BUSINESS is apparently custody-switching, titles to the contrary….

How far away is the Gulag Archipelago from this Designer Family Concept?

Not too far, from what I can see.

Gag me with a spoon…..

For further reference on this topic.

http://www.NAFCJ.net.

For more on Kansas, Google (or search my post also)   Claudine Dombrowski, Oletha Faust-Goudeau (and etc.).  Kansas thought ANOTHER fatherhood initiative was needed recently.  Guess they forgot about all the other programs racing through the courts, governments, county jails, child support agencies, faith-based nonprofit organizations, and university advanced social sciences programs, and — did I miss a venue?  No matter, fatherhood initiatives will turn up there sooner or later.  Just you wait…

LOOK:  If it’s a court, let it be a court.  If it’s therapy, let it be therapy.  Tell the truth on the label outside the door.  Also tell all the mothers involved what’s being done, out of their vision, hearing, and awareness, with the Dads of their children.  So they can, like me, put their two bits in.

Failure to call things what they are in my book is simply called lying.  No wonder confusion is rampant and mental health professionals are swamped, and stressed out with clients.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.  In order to put SOME kind of order to thoughts, it’s necessary to have a somewhat standard point of reference for the words used to describe them.

What I read about here — that’s not court, that’s a farce of a court process.  Everyone might as well go laughing to their various banks, those that have them, while the single mothers, scourge of our nation, go find a 3rd job, and then get criticized openly in family court for their “relationship” with the latchkey kids.

Some of these Dads had legitimate problems.  How many of them were screened for prior domestic violence and use of the child support system to apply pressure on the  mothers of their kids?  If so, why do they get the kid glove, and the families the backside of the hand?

I advise people to totally avoid the child support system, if at all possible.  I do not think it’s redeemable at this point.  Too large, too much power, and too many people are dying when people get pissed off at its proclamations.  The office shooting in Orlando, FL had a child support debt element, for those who noticed.  The shooting (one died) took place in an office, but it was a Dad, with history of controlling and abuse, and a child support debt of over $11,000.  

Was it a fair ruling?  Quite possibly that system is adding to the stress factors.

I was within range of not needing child support, but I couldn’t get the protection to my own work life and relationships to make it all the way home.  Somehow, that doesn’t seem (in retrospect), “accidental” at all.  Strong, independent, law-abiding single mothers upset the machinery here, and it seems courts like these, and other programs, are intent on doing away with us, and our connection with our kids.  We may maintain it, but it will cost us — whether through supervised visitation or thousands in lawyers in the family law system; once entered — exit is difficult.

If these comments are helpful (or your gut reaction to them is like mine to the article), please feel free to comment on-line.

Have a nice day.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Family ‘Lawless’ Court Whores.

Permalink

My Gut Reaction to More News of a Fathering Court. Let’sGetHonestBlog

Let’sGetHonestBlog

Not a Private Matter – Why "Family" "Law" System Hurts Us All

My gut reaction to more news of a fathering court.

It takes but a few moments of passion for a man to start a child.

Between funding of abstinence education, healthy marriage initiatives, fatherhood initiatives, a fantastic public school system (USA), trailing the industrialized world in several core topics, like reading and math, and rampant crime inside and outside the schools, between initiatives preventing parents from knowing whether or not a teen daughter has gone to have an abortion on school time, and so forth — PERHAPS with this, and of course the  help of the child support system — and fathering courts–

We might find a few good men with moral integrity and empathy for the welfare of their offspring.

Or is it– according to this plan — make some, evidently.

I add my sarcastic comments just so the text doesn’t blithely slip down reader’s gullets and a  warm fuzzy feeling about the nobility of this enterprise get assimilated into the thinking system.

Then again, what you assimilate is your choice.  When you read, remember that every Court Commissioner, Defense prosecutor, and public prosecutor mentioned is, I would think, on public dole also.  Welcome to the OK Corral..

http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-story-daddy-do-over-110609,0,5997057.story
Jackson County Pioneers Missouri Move to Fathering Courts
John Holt, edited by Jason Vaughn
November 6, 2009
KANSAS CITY, MO – Kevin Gainey was on top of the world. A good job as a bail bondsman, a lake home, and custody of his young son following his divorce.

{{FUNNY, I thought there was gender bias against men in family courts.  That’d be an interesting  case to look up. . . . Maybe  Mom must have abused substances, abandoned children, been a slut and was off with another man, or simply a stay at home Mom who was financially outclassed somehow.   Maybe she was a working Mom and he was a stay at home father?   Or, maybe she just gave them to him, not being financially independent and called that a good deal.  Or perhaps she was not emotionally connected to her son.  There are a thousand reasons this father, not mother, may have gotten custody of his son after a divorce, all of which might be relevant to the story, and shed a different light on the situations, and the wisdom — or lack of it — of whichever judge decided to allocate custody of his son to a Dad.  Boys should be with fathers {{no matter the character…}} was maybe the thinking, I guess.  HOW OLD was the son?  Who had been previous caretaker?  Was his former Mom a stay at home Mom?  Was the divorce contested or amicable?  What was that background story???}}

But bad habits caught up with him, his son moved back with his mom, and Gainey lost his job.

{{“bad habits caught up with him.”  Yeah, let’s gloss over that aspect.

Poor fellow, couldn’t run fast enough.  Was it meth, crack, heroin, alcohol, pornography, — WHAT bad habits.  No matter, poor dear, he couldn’t outrun himself..

Also, I note, “moved BACK with his Mom,” meaning, she had custody, then lost it.  Maybe not.  But if so, Gee, sound familiar, folks? — except the actually getting to move back with Mom part…}}

“Wasn’t always accountable for my actions,” Gainey now says. “A lot of it had to do with my substance abuse problem.”

{{So what did the rest of it have to do with??}}

{{Externalizes the problem –  I am so familiar with this language pattern!  Not his fault, still..}}

{{Notice he didn’t say:  I wasn’t always accountable, I abused substances (and which one[s])..and “I hurt my son” }}with what ramifications…was it endangering his son most likely?  What was he doing to support his “bad habits” and “substance abuse” problem that caused a radical custody switch?)

With no money, doing odd jobs, and a sobriety issue {{SO it was alcohol…}}, Gainey fell behind in his child support, and wound up facing criminal charges.

{{Again poor dear, he was drinking, making holding a job difficult– apparently AFTER he lost custody of his son, as child support was involved.  I say apparently, because I don’t know for sure, but it seems likely…}}

Despite that, prosecutors deemed him a good candidate for a diversion program that could give Gainey a fresh start and keep him out of prison: fathering court.

{{FORMULA:  State & Court order child support.  Child support not paid.  This is contempt of a law, and a quasi-criminal situation that can land a parent in jail, the purpose of which is to communicate that child support is a serious issue and to be paid.  However, there’s a way to dilute that message that child support IS for children, IS important, and that neglecting it IS negligence, when the potential to pay exists (i.e., stop drinking, and instead work, or at least seek work….  get help yourself…)

Enter — voila! —

{{FATHERING COURT, LAUNCHED 1998}}

((Somehow, I sense as systemic setup — do you?))  ((My blog talks about the Father’s Resolutions passed in 1998 & 1999 in US Congress, and posts some links and excerpts of the horror that XX% of African American children are sleeping in homes without their fathers in them nationwide, and how Congress can stop the is travesty….

Note:  The 15 yr old girl gang raped, with passers by, in Richmond, CA recently had a father in the home.  He just wasn’t at the door leaving the dance to get her.  The victim, and it’s STILL no excuse, but she was 15 and inhaled a good deal of alcohol first.  She had a father.  Must have been a statistical anomaly.  Meanwhile, in another state here, to protect young sons (like the one exposed to substance abuse, above) and the young daughters (like the one whose  currently devastated Dad, I’m sure, did NOT show up needy and underemployed in a fathering court, apparently) we need MORE, not LESS< “therapeutic jurisprudence.”

In fact, let’s actually just SKIP the jurisprudence part (except for the labels on the door) and go straight to therapy, just CALLING it “court.”

Gag me with a spoon.. . .Or show me the up and coming “mothering” courts.  No one gives us that rope, that I’ve seen!

It will not change the wheels of the institutions — we still need more fathering intervention nationwide, and grants to fund them, and to alter the philosophical basis of law to accommodate a “required outcome” of more father-contact, and to bribe, cajole, coach, and help men  to understand they must actually help FEED those they BREED.

Launched in 1998, Jackson County’s fathering court is modeled after its drug court: parents, most often dads  {{Well, THAT”s a shocker….}}, get help meeting the challenges that may be holding them back through an initial screening. Regular follow-up court appearances are designed to keep them on track.

“I think that’s the role of fathering court. To identify the barriers that are preventing payment of support, and then to direct them to the services that resolve those issues,” says Family Court Commissioner Patrick Campbell, himself a father of two.

Commissioner Campbell presides over the court which meets weekly in Division 43.

{{Let me get this straight:  He presides over this court, presumably making decisions and signing court orders affecting men, women, and their mutual children, and THINKS he understands its purpose?  Does this Commissioner have a law degree in any state?}}

{{Are there any actual rules of court which apply in this situation?  By the way, people have a right to be heard by a judge, not a commissioner, if they choose, or so I heard.  I suppose that’s not highly publicized over there…}}

On a recent morning it was a crowded docket, as Commissioner Campbell greeted men who must demonstrate that they are making progress, make some kind of regular payment toward child support, and attend a 12 week parenting class.

{{Yes, there’s no problem on earth that a good parenting class can’t solve.  }}

“Congratulations”, Campbell tells one dad. “I told you when you graduated and got a job I was going to raise you up a little bit. So I’m going to raise each of them to 150 a month.”

To another dad, the commissioner urges contact with his kids: **”These three kids have one dad and you’re it,” he tells the man, who admits he hasn’t seen his children much.

**I am a mother.  I am having to fight pretty damn hard for contact with my kids, and there’s not one court commissioner, court-appointed attorney, mediator, judge or any one else assisting me.  But because I wasn’t abusing substances and in trouble with the law, there were no “services” offered to help.  In fact, when I went seeking them — after child-stealing on an overnight– they weren’t found.  Period.  If anything, these courts were resisting.  I didn’t understand this fully til, again, I looked up the “Access Visitation” grants system and “REQUIRED OUTCOME” for grant recipients.  You can research this, too — my blog, others, or the internet.  THAT’s what this is about.  NOT the kids…

To other men he’s a cheerleader, a task master, a coach, urging some to get something as simple as an email address so they can receive job listings sent to them by the program.

“You try to make a quick decision as to whether this is a time to encourage them or is this a time to push ‘em where they’re not comfortable,” Campbell says later.

{{I am so sorry to find that the public servants in this country feel the need to parent parents, and have forgotten their assigned duties and oaths of office (for those who are also attorneys).  The President of the USA had to swear an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution.  This includes due process, and laws.  What’s up with this crowd?  ???}}

A prosecutor and defense attorney stand at the bench with each of the dads, but unlike other settings, they appear more like a team, working with, rather than against each other in a court where there is no court reporter, and nothing is on the record.

{{WOW.  That’s wonderfully reassuring that all decisions will be ethical, fair, not subject to any forms of bribery or kickback, and protect the interests of the children involved, and the rest of the society not to have to pick up the tab….}}

“They see that we’re all trying to help them get to where they need to be,” says prosecutor Rebecca Leavett, who calls fathering court her favorite docket. “And I think they get more relaxed and trust us, they open up to us more about the issues that are actually going on in their lives.”

{{Translation:  some of them can be disarmingly open — when there’s money at stake.  I am so glad that the prosecutor and the defense attorneys — in an adversarial system designed for the truth to come out, through due process, and fair judgments be made — are in truth not even PRETENDING to do “bad cop, good cop,” but admitting that it’s all a show.  . . . . . .   }}

{{I”m so glad that these hardened attorneys get to have some moments of warm fuzzy feelings of do-goodism.  Perhaps the single mothers (if applicable) and fatherless children can take that warm fuzzy feeling and serve it up hot for dinner, or hug it as a pillow on a cold night.  Perhaps those attorneys might want to empathize with those not actually present in court, in their warm fuzziness on the law…and accountability…. AA for effort, eh??  }}

Her counterpart agrees.

“This isn’t a time for secrets, this isn’t a time for somebody to come up and say ‘whoa that’s attorney-client privilege, I want to keep this between me and my attorney,” says Gaurika Anand, a public defender who works with most of the dads.

Along with court transcripts, adversarial process designed to elicit truth, we now also want to do away with attorney-client privilege.  Gee, I wonder what ELSE is on the docket here??

Are the sons and daughters of these child-support-deprived kids going to grow up realizing, as their Dads now have, that it’s not actual performance, but just a public effort, that actually counts in life?  We can’t expect real standards based on real needs, after all….

I say this as a teacher, most of my adult professional life.  I know that failing to make standards clear, and then get a consensus to excel at reaching them – accomplishment and stretching those standards upwards by effort (not bribery…) produces the warm fuzzy feelings.  Not cheating them by constantly reducing the bottom line…}}

This year, Missouri lawmakers saw the eleven year old Jackson County court as a good model, and approved the concept statewide. So far several circuit courts have expressed interest, but there’s little money for launching new fathering courts. A state court spokesman says it’s expected the concept will eventually spread when the state’s economy improves.

Gainey is just happy he had the concept to benefit from in Jackson County. Initially reluctant to attend the parenting classes, he eventually did, and is grateful for the opportunity. He’s slowly whittling down his $17,000 back child support bill, has attended rehab, and says he’s now sober and working toward a better life.

When Gainey and other dads graduate, the criminal non-support charges are gone, so long as they continue to work to pay down their child support debt.

“There’s no way I could disrespect the opportunity family court’s given me,” he says. “This is gonna’ happen.”

That’s what Commissioner Campbell wants to hear from more of his participating dads.

“In this court you actually see people make changes.” he says. “I would never tell you it would be all of those making changes, but you see a lot of people make primary fundamental changes in their life. And that’s a very encouraging thing to see.”

__._,_.___

When you mix this scenario in with domestic violence, just know that economic abuse is a common factor.  While I’m VERY jaundiced, there’s a reason –  my personal experience, which is not unique, as a mother, watching the impact of sporadic child support payments, the NON response of the system to do anything about it when I worked and invested diligent time to get them to (and involved others).  When the children lived with me, it stalled, delayed, obstructed, and gave me double-talk answers to direct questions.    This affected my children, and my relationship with them.

The second the custody switch happened, this same system that would NOT move for a single mother, went aggressively to bat for a father who’d just responded to my attempts to collect by snatching the kids! 

This will all come out in the wash eventually.  Warm fuzzies (I don’t share them, in this matter) in one place don’t compensate for hungry children elsewhere.

For those new to these posts — the OCSE (That’s federal Office of Child Support Enforcement) are administering the grants to the states for increasing noncustodial parent (translation:  FATHERS) involvement with their kids through mandated mediation, parenting plans, and other issues designed to –    I hate to keep repeating this truth, but it’s the truth– diverting the evidence and fact-finding process from OUTSIDE The courtroom (and off the record — see this above case!) — to court paraprofessionals whose BUSINESS is apparently custody-switching, titles to the contrary….

How far away is the Gulag Archipelago from this Designer Family Concept?

Not too far, from what I can see.

Gag me with a spoon…..

For further reference on this topic.

http://www.NAFCJ.net

For more on Kansas, Google (or search my post also)  Claudine Dombrowski, Oletha Faust-Goudeau (and etc.).  Kansas thought ANOTHER fatherhood initiative was needed recently.  Guess they forgot about all the other programs racing through the courts, governments, county jails, child support agencies, faith-based nonprofit organizations, and university advanced social sciences programs, and — did I miss a venue?  No matter, fatherhood initiatives will turn up there sooner or later.  Just you wait…

LOOK:  If it’s a court, let it be a court.  If it’s therapy, let it be therapy.  Tell the truth on the label outside the door.  Also tell all the mothers involved what’s being done, out of their vision, hearing, and awareness, with the Dads of their children.  So they can, like me, put their two bits in.

Failure to call things what they are in my book is simply called lying.  No wonder confusion is rampant and mental health professionals are swamped, and stressed out with clients. 

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.  In order to put SOME kind of order to thoughts, it’s necessary to have a somewhat standard point of reference for the words used to describe them.

What I read about here — that’s not court, that’s a farce of a court process.  Everyone might as well go laughing to their various banks, those that have them, while the single mothers, scourge of our nation, go find a 3rd job, and then get criticized openly in family court for their “relationship” with the latchkey kids.

Some of these Dads had legitimate problems.  How many of them were screened for prior domestic violence and use of the child support system to apply pressure on the  mothers of their kids?  If so, why do they get the kid glove, and the families the backside of the hand?

I advise people to totally avoid the child support system, if at all possible.  I do not think it’s redeemable at this point.  Too large, too much power, and too many people are dying when people get pissed off at its proclamations.  the office shooting in Orlando, FL had a child support debt element, for those who noticed.  The shooting (one died) took place in an office, but it was a Dad, with history of controlling and abuse, and a child support debt of over $11,000.   

Was it a fair ruling?  Quite possibly that system is adding to the stress factors.

I was within range of not needing child support, but I couldn’t get the protection to my own work life and relationships to make it all the way home.  Somehow, that doesn’t seem (in retrospect), “accidental” at all.  Strong, independent, law-abiding single mothers upset the  machinery here, and it seems courts like these, and other programs, are intent on doing away with us, and our connection with our kids.  We may maintain it, but it will cost us — whether through supervised visitation, or thousands in lawyers in the family law system; once entered — exit is difficult.

If these comments are helpful (or your gut reaction to them is like mine to the article), please feel free to comment on-line.

Have a nice day.

Written by familycourtmatters

November 9, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Posted in Cast, Script, Characters, Scenery, Stage Directions, Context of Custody Switch, Designer Families, Funding Fathers – literally, History of Family Court,Mandatory Mediation, public education

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Posted in : Child Abuse, Crime, Families, Juvenile Crime, Murder,, Abuse, Abused Children, Abuser, Don Hoffman FR Layer Topeka Kansas, Hal Richard, Activism, Best interest of children, Best interest of the child, Best interest of the children, California, Call to action, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Children and Domestic Viol, Amy Leitchberg, Angry fathers, Anne Grant, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Battered Mothers Custody Conference-Battered Women, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, CIVIL RIGHTS, CPS, Child Abuse, Child Custody Issues Battered Women, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Do, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence, Family Court Reform, Family Courts, Family Rights, Human Rights,Husbands who murder wives, Intimate Partner, Child Custody-, Child found,, Children's rights, Cohersive Control, Genocide Battered Women, Collin Momany, Phoenix, Arizona, Corrupt bastards, Crisis in America's Family Courts, Curt and Christi Brungardt, Custody Hell, Custody scam the lizlibrary, Domestic Law, Domestic Violence, Domestic Violence on rise in shawnee county, Don Hoffman, Dr. David Rodehheffer, Topeka Court Whore, Eric, Erin, Family Anilhition-the killers are fathers, Family Violence, Fatalities, GOVERNMENT OPPRESSION, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Governor sebelius, Hal Richardson wife beater child abuser topeka kansas, Human Rights, Industry of abuse, Jana Mackey, Jason Hoffman, Court Appointed Child Abusers, Jessica Gonzales, Castle Rock, CO- Inter-American Commission Human Rights-Violence Against women, Judge, Judge Punishs Mom for not following Orders of Abuse, Judge david 'death' Debenham, Jurror 13, Jurror Thirteen, www.EyesForJustice.com,, KS -Outraged जुद्गेस, KS protective parent reform act, KTKA49 News, Jessica Drew, Domestic Violence Topeka, KU Basketball, Kansas Domestic violence, Kansas NOW Lobbyist, Kansas University, Little hostages, M. Jill Dykes, Martinez, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Nazi America, Human Expieriments, McLean, McLeans, Mother of Murdered Children Speaks, Amy Castillo, Motherhood, Mothers Rights, Myers, OUTRAGEOUSE, Odysseey Group Topeka Kansas a perps BEST FRIEND, Odyssey KS Drex Flott MSW, Odyssey KS Kara Haney MS, Over,homicide,victims,attacker,tools,behavior,relations, PAS- Perpetrators Aligning Strategically, Parental Alienation Syndrome, Parental Alienation=Pepetrators Aligning Stategiaclly, Proclamation Day, Reform Family Courts, Sean, Shared Parenting, Batterer women dead children,, Snitch and Hydroponic marijuana grower, Speak Out, Susan Murphy Milano, Maternal Deprivation, System abuse, Torture Shared Parenting, PAS PAS PAS, Un-Justice System, Upon, Washburn University, affair, agreement, child rapists, children-need-both-parents, contempt, custody, death, domestic-violence-awareness,, family court corruption, fathers rights-abusers rights, fees, guardian, homicide, human trafficking, jill dykes court appointed child abuser, judicial corruption, legal kidnapping, logic, lover, murder murder domestic violence fatalaties, orders, parent, parental alienation =perps aligning strategically, profiting, psychiatrist, theraputic jurisprudence, whores of the court, whores of the court, the falling of abusers rights,, • CUSTODY ISSUES FALSE ALLEGATIONS FAMILY COURT FEMICIDE MURDER-SUICIDE UNCATEGORIZED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Leave a Comment »

November 9th Response to Show Cause Hearing set Battered Mothers loose Custody to Abusers; Domestic Violence on rise in Shawnee County

2009 November 9th Response to Show Cause Hearing set November 13 dombrowski

 

 

http://www.ktka.com/news/2009/oct/20/domestic_violence_rise_shawnee_county/

Domestic violence is on the rise in Shawnee County

 

"I remember curling up in a ball to protect her from the kicks," domestic violence survivor, Claudine Dombrowski, described.

Claudine Dombrowski is a survivor to domestic violence, a cycle she went back to many times. "I had a choice I could see my daughter or I could never see her again. The abuser had complete control, so I got my daughter back and went back to him."

Going back to an abusive relationship is a problem District Attorney Chad Taylor said his office sees quite often. "We see it everyday, and it’s just a matter of the psychology of the cycle of abuse," Taylor said.

The number of cases coming across Taylor’s desk is growing. "Our year to date projections for 2009 total is going to be an increase of about 80 percent for the domestic battery cases that we filed," Taylor said.

Claudine fights to help women like herself who have fallen in the hands of abuse. "This was the crow bar, and then I was beaten and raped," Dombrowski said.

She said she never reported her beatings until after her daughter was born.

Taylor said it happens often, "It goes from bruises to hospitalization, to like we said this is all about homicide prevention."

Claudine said even if you haven’t been a victim, you probably know someone who has and you can help them. "Don’t think it’s you…get rid of the scarlet letter of shame, it’s the most important thing."

Taylor wants to show there’s help out there for victims. "Making this a priority and letting people know that this will not be tolerated in our community," Taylor said.

Taylor’s office gave us statisitics on Domestic Violence in 2008 the DA’s office received 1267 cases, out of those 508 were filed. Starting from January 1st until October 16, 2009 there have been 1347 cases received, and out of those 849 cases have been filed.

One Domestic Battery charges, in 2008 there were 723 received and 246 filed for court. The projections for this year are 784 received and 443 filed, meaning an eighty percent increase on Domestic Battery.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Posted in 16191703, 16192975, : Child Abuse, Crime, Families, Juvenile Crime, Murder,, Abuse, Abused Children, Abuser, Don Hoffman FR Layer Topeka Kansas, Hal Richard, Activism, Best interest of children, Best interest of the child, Best interest of the children, California, Call to action, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Children and Domestic Viol, Amy Leitchberg, Angry fathers, Anne Grant, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Battered Mothers Custody Conference-Battered Women, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, CIVIL RIGHTS, CPS, Child Abuse, Child Custody Issues Battered Women, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Do, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence, Family Court Reform, Family Courts, Family Rights, Human Rights,Husbands who murder wives, Intimate Partner, Child Custody-, Child found,, Children's rights, Claudine dombrowski, Cohersive Control, Genocide Battered Women, Collin Momany, Phoenix, Arizona, Corrupt bastards, Crisis in America's Family Courts, Curt and Christi Brungardt, Custody Hell, Custody scam the lizlibrary, Dead,Apparent,Double,Murder,Suicide,Texas,, Domestic Law, Domestic Violence, Domestic Violence on rise in shawnee county, Don Hoffman, Dr. David Rodehheffer, Topeka Court Whore, Family Anilhition-the killers are fathers, Family Violence, GOVERNMENT OPPRESSION, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Governor sebelius, Hal Richardson wife beater child abuser topeka kansas, Human Rights, Jana Mackey, Jason Hoffman, Court Appointed Child Abusers, Jessica Gonzales, Castle Rock, CO- Inter-American Commission Human Rights-Violence Against women, Judge, Judge Punishs Mom for not following Orders of Abuse, Judge david 'death' Debenham, Jurror 13, Jurror Thirteen, www.EyesForJustice.com,, KS -Outraged जुद्गेस, KS protective parent reform act, KTKA49 News, Jessica Drew, Domestic Violence Topeka, KU Basketball, Kansas NOW Lobbyist, Kansas University, Little hostages, M. Jill Dykes, Martinez, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Nazi America, Human Expieriments, McLean, McLeans, Mother of Murdered Children Speaks, Amy Castillo, Motherhood, Mothers Rights, Myers, OUTRAGEOUSE, Odysseey Group Topeka Kansas a perps BEST FRIEND, Odyssey KS Drex Flott MSW, Odyssey KS Kara Haney MS, Over,homicide,victims,attacker,tools,behavior,relations, PAS- Perpetrators Aligning Strategically, Parental Alienation Syndrome, Parental Alienation=Pepetrators Aligning Stategiaclly, Reform Family Courts, Shared Parenting, Batterer women dead children,, Snitch and Hydroponic marijuana grower, Speak Out, Susan Murphy Milano, Maternal Deprivation, System abuse, Torture Shared Parenting, PAS PAS PAS, Un-Justice System, Washburn University, affair, agreement, child rapists, children, children-need-both-parents, contempt, custody, death, domestic-violence-awareness,, family court corruption, fathers rights-abusers rights, fees, guardian, homicide, human trafficking, jill dykes court appointed child abuser, judicial corruption, legal kidnapping, logic, lover, murder murder domestic violence fatalaties, orders, parent, parental alienation =perps aligning strategically, profiting, psychiatrist, theraputic jurisprudence, whores of the court, whores of the court, the falling of abusers rights,, • CUSTODY ISSUES FALSE ALLEGATIONS FAMILY COURT FEMICIDE MURDER-SUICIDE UNCATEGORIZED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Leave a Comment »

KS: Senator Joe Patton (R) says Change is Overdue for Juvenile Justice Authority

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] KS-Family Court Reform Coalition.

Permalink

Editorial: Change overdue

http://cjonline.com/opinion/2009-11-03/editorial_change_overdue

BY THE CAPITAL-JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD

November 3, 2009 – 12:10am

When people talk about hindsight offering 20-20 vision, it’s usually after something inexcusable has happened. Such is the case with changes to be made by the Juvenile Justice Authority.

The head of JJA last week announced the authority would begin requiring independent inspections twice a year of juvenile facilities operated by contractors and make recommendation for any needed changes, would classify juvenile homes for low-, medium- and high-risk offenders and would use a uniform test to assess the risk posed by each juvenile in its care. The changes are overdue, but welcome nonetheless.

A Topeka legislator who is a member of the Committee on Corrections, Republican Joe Patton, credited the new policies to a lawsuit filed against Forbes Juvenile Attention Center alleging a 12-year-old boy was repeatedly raped in January 2008 by his 15-year-old roommate at the facility. Criminal charges also were filed against the older boy. The lawsuit and staffing issues were among details about the FJAC highlighted in stories published last month in this newspaper.

It’s unfortunate that it takes such a serious case to bring about change, but we’d be remiss if we didn’t credit JJA Commissioner Russ Jennings with implementing changes designed to lessen the chances such a thing could happen again. Jennings, appointed by former Gov. Kathleen Sebelius in February 2007 to lead the Juvenile Justice Authority, had decided to adopt the new policies under his own authority as commissioner but also sought the support of the Committee on Corrections.

The chairwoman of that committee acknowledged last week that Kansas was behind some other states in terms of risk assessment for juvenile offenders — the Youthful Level of Service Case Management Inventory to be implemented by JJA has been around for some time and already is used by four district courts — and credited Jennings with trying to catch up. That sounds good, and we wish Jennings well. But there were early warnings that the 12-year-old wasn’t a good fit for FJAC and what he would encounter there. At least one FJAC case coordinator, who was in a position to know, told the court’s case manager the youth would be "eaten alive" at Forbes because of his small size.

It’s apparent Jennings and his administrative staff would do well to also listen to those who work with the juveniles who find their way into the system.

Patton said the new policies and the committee’s endorsement of them served as a message about the importance of ensuring the safety of juveniles. The committee, he said, was watching and would follow up on the changes.

We’re sure the public, which doesn’t expect 12-year-olds to be harmed while in the state’s care, also will be watching.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] KS-Family Court Reform Coalition.

Permalink

Duchesne man charged with family abuse ‘as bad as it gets’

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights – A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Duchesne man charged with family abuse ‘as bad as it gets’

By Geoff Liesik

Deseret Newshttp://www.deseretnews.com/article/705342746/Duchesne-man-charged-with-family-abuse-as-bad-as-it-gets.html?pg=2

Published: Friday, Nov. 6, 2009 11:06 p.m. MST

25 comments

FacebookFarkBuzzDiggE-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + -

A Duchesne County man has been arrested in what investigators say is a case of domestic violence that is "as bad as it gets."

The 38-year-old man is accused in court records of beating his wife with everything from a board to his work boots, threatening to kill her if she "didn’t act right" and raping her twice.

He also allegedly stomped repeatedly on his son after the boy ate a piece of cheese without permission.

"It’s been a war zone in their home," said Duchesne County Sheriff’s Sgt. Wade Butterfield, who called the investigation "gut-wrenching."

"I’ve told my kids as they’ve been growing up there’s no such thing as monsters," the sergeant added. "I’ve been lying to them, because there are monsters. This guy is a monster."

The Deseret News is not naming the man in an effort to protect the identities of his alleged victims.

Butterfield said deputies investigating an assault complaint against the man in mid-September were provided with an eight-page narrative by his wife. The document outlined abuse the woman said she and the couple’s five children endured at least weekly over the past 17 years.

Story continues below

"Literally there were too many incidents of domestic violence and child abuse to even separate," the sergeant said. "It was as bad as it gets. We’re just very, very fortunate that somebody didn’t lose their life."

During an interview in October, the woman told authorities she "lived a life of complete servitude" since marrying her husband in 1992, charging documents state. She said she was expected to have sex with her husband whenever he wanted, day or night, and if the "sessions" didn’t work out the way he planned, she would be beaten.

"She said she didn’t want to have sex with him at all because of the beatings," court records state. "She claimed that she was in pain all the time because she didn’t have time to heal between beatings."

Butterfield said he was able to identify two specific instances where the man’s alleged conduct constituted rape, including once with a broom handle.

"She reported that right after that happened, and before she could care for herself, that he made her cower with her face in the corner until she had permission to leave the corner," court records state.

The couple’s children, ages 9 to 17, were not immune from abuse either, Butterfield said. The woman and her children told investigators that the man would keep track of the family’s food, including counting how many slices of cheese were in the refrigerator. Butterfield said when the youngest child ate a slice of cheese in 2008 without his father’s OK, he was thrown across a hallway by his hair, knocked to the ground and stomped on by the man, who was wearing heavy work boots.

(The woman) said she grabbed a two-by-four and hit (her husband) with it to get him to stop," court records state. "She said when she did this, he took (the board) from her and beat her with it."

Butterfield interviewed the man for three hours Thursday and said the man corroborated some of the allegations made by his wife. He acknowledged rationing food, the sergeant said, but said it was because "they were poor and the kids were wasteful," and alleged that his wife’s alcohol use and poor parenting led to many of the problems in the home.

"He tried to minimize and play the denial game," Butterfield said, "but in the end he recognized that there was violence in his home and that things were completely out of control."

The woman and her children have left Duchesne County and are doing well, according to investigators, considering what allegedly took place in their remote home.

"She’s healed up, and the weight of the world is off her shoulders," Butterfield said. "She doesn’t even look like the same person that I interviewed a few weeks ago."

The man is scheduled to make an initial court appearance Monday in 8th District Court for two counts of rape, both first-degree felonies, and one count each of aggravated assault and child abuse, both second-degree felonies. He is being held in the Duchesne County Jail in lieu of $160,000 bail.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights – A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

"Men’s Rights" Groups Have Become Frighteningly Effective They’re changing custody rights and domestic violence laws.

"Men’s Rights" Groups Have Become Frighteningly Effective

They’re changing custody rights and domestic violence laws.

http://www.doublex.com/section/news-politics/mens-rights-groups-have-become-frighteningly-effective?page=0,0

By: Kathryn Joyce

Posted: November 5, 2009 at 7:45 AM

At the end of October, National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, members of the men’s movement group RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting [2]) gathered on the steps of Congress to lobby against what they say are the suppressed truths about domestic violence: that false allegations are rampant, that a feminist-run court system fraudulently separates innocent fathers from children, that battered women’s shelters are running a racket that funnels federal dollars to feminists, that domestic-violence laws give cover to cagey mail-order brides seeking Green Cards, and finally, that men are victims of an unrecognized epidemic of violence at the hands of abusive wives.

“It’s now reached the point,” reads a statement from RADAR, “that domestic violence laws represent the largest roll-back in Americans’ civil rights since the Jim Crow era!”

RADAR’s rhetoric may seem overblown, but lately the group and its many partners have been racking up very real accomplishments. In 2008, the organization claimed to have blocked passage of four federal domestic-violence bills, among them an expansion of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to international scope and a grant to support lawyers in pro bono domestic-violence work. Members of this coalition have gotten themselves onto drafting committees for VAWA’s 2011 reauthorization. Local groups in West Virginia and California have also had important successes, criminalizing false claims of domestic violence in custody cases, and winning rulings that women-only shelters are discriminatory.

Groups like RADAR fall under the broader umbrella of the men’s rights movement, a loose coalition of anti-feminist groups. These men’s rights activists, or MRAs, have long been written off by domestic-violence advocates as a bombastic and fringe group of angry white men, and for good reason. Bernard Chapin, a popular men’s rights blogger, told me over e-mail that he will refer to me as “Feminist E,” since he never uses real names for feminists, who are wicked and who men “must verbally oppose … until our flesh oxidizes into dust.” In the United Kingdom, a father’s rights group scaled Buckingham Palace in superhero costumes. In Australia, they wore paramilitary uniforms and demonstrated outside the houses of female divorcees.

But lately they’ve become far more polished and savvy about advancing their views. In their early days of lobbying, “these guys would show up and have this looming body language that was very off-putting,” says Ben Atherton-Zeman, author of Voices of Men, a one-man play about domestic violence and sexual assault. “But that’s all changed. A lot of the leaders are still convicted batterers, but they’re well-organized, they speak in complete sentences, they sound much more reasonable: All we want is equal custody, for fathers not to be ignored.”

One of the respectable new faces of the movement is Glenn Sacks, a fathers’ rights columnist and radio host with 50,000 e-mail followers, and a pragmatist in a world of angry dreamers. Sacks is a former feminist and abortion-clinic defender who disavows what he calls “the not-insubstantial lunatic fringe of the fathers’ rights movement.” He recently merged his successful media group with the shared-parenting organization Fathers and Families in a bid to build a mainstream fathers’ rights organ on par with the National Organization of Women. Many of Sacks’ arguments—for a court assumption of shared parenting in the case of divorce, or against child-support rigidity in the midst of recession—can sound reasonable.

But do any of their arguments hold up? Many of the men for whom Sacks advocates are involved in extreme cases, says Joanie Dawson, a writer and domestic-violence advocate who has covered the fathers’ rights movement. The great majority of custody cases, in which shared parenting is a legitimate option, are settled or resolved privately. But of the 15 percent that go to family court—the cases that fathers’ rights groups target—at least half include alleged domestic abuse.

Unsurprisingly, this argument is missing from MRA discussions of custody inequality and recruitment ads, which cast all men as potentially innocent victims “just one 911 call away” from losing everything they have earned and loved. These rallying calls, and the divorce attorneys hawking men’s rights expertise on MRA sites, promising to “teach her a lesson,” serve as what Dawson sees as a powerful draw for men in the midst of painful divorces.

While MRA groups continue to expand their base of embittered fathers and ex-husbands, they’ve cleaned up their image to court more powerful allies. RADAR board member Ron Grignal, the former president of Fathers for Virginia and a former state delegate candidate, organizes the group’s Washington lobbying activities. In 2008, RADAR partnered with Eagle Forum for a conference at the Heritage Foundation about the threat that VAWA poses to the family. Grignal argues that state interpretations of VAWA are so broad they could cast couples’ money disputes as domestic violence, enabling unwarranted restraining orders that then win women’s divorce cases for them. Politicians, Grignal says, are increasingly on board with men’s rights movement concerns.

“On domestic violence, I’ve had both state and federal legislators tell me they know that this process is out of control,” says Grignal. “They’re afraid if they support [reforms] they’ll be tagged as ‘for domestic violence.’ But I’ve had Democrats on Capitol Hill tell me they agree with everything I say. A member of the Congressional Black Caucus told me that his brother can’t see his kids, and his wife threatened to throw herself down the stairs to ruin his political career.”

Some domestic-violence protections do seem to have unintended effects, such as mandatory-arrest policies that compel police to take someone into custody in response to any domestic-violence call—a policy that has been criticized by RADAR as well as by some domestic-violence advocates, who say it imposes an absurd equivalence between largely nonviolent family spats or insubstantial female violence and serious abuse. But groups like RADAR are criticizing the law for the wrong reasons. In fact, the effect of mandatory arrest in conflating women’s low-level violence with battery, seems very close to RADAR’s campaign for viewing women as equal domestic abusers.

One potent idea advanced by MRAs is the claim that men are equal victims of domestic violence. Mark Rosenthal, president and co-founder of RADAR, makes a very personal argument for the phenomenon. Rosenthal, who doesn’t call himself an MRA, grew up with a mother who he says terrorized the entire family and hit her husband frequently. The true impact of the violence, he says, was more than physical and eclipsed his petite mother’s ability to inflict serious injuries. Rosenthal wants to see an appreciation for women’s nonphysical abuse incorporated into domestic-violence policy. “It’s not about size,” he told an audience at a law enforcement domestic-violence training. “It’s not exclusively about physical attacks. However, it is about a pathological need to control others, and women are as prone to this as men.”

RADAR and other MRA groups base their battered men arguments largely on the research of a small group of social scientists who claim that domestic violence between couples is equally divided, just unequally reported. Most notable are the studies conducted by sociologist Murray Straus of the University of New Hampshire, who has written extensively on female violence (and who Dawson saw distributing RADAR flyers at an APA conference). Straus’ research is starting to move public opinion. A Los Angeles conference this July dedicated to discussing male victims of domestic violence, “From Ideology to Inclusion 2009: New Directions in Domestic Violence Research and Intervention,” received positive mainstream press for its “inclusive” efforts.

While some men certainly are victims of female domestic violence, advocates say the number is closer to 3 percent to 4 percent, rather than the 45 percent to 50 percent RADAR claims. Jack Straton, a Portland State University professor and member of Oregon’s Attorney General’s Sexual Assault Task Force, argues that Straus critically fails to distinguish between the intent and effect of violence, equating “a woman pushing a man in self-defense to a man pushing a woman down the stairs,” or a single act of female violence with years of male abuse; that Straus only interviewed one partner, when couples’ accounts of violence commonly diverge; and that he excludes from his study post-separation violence, which accounts for more than 75 percent of spouse-on-spouse violence, 93 percent of which is committed by men.

All in all, advocates say that cherry-picked studies from researchers like Straus, touted by the MRAs, amount to what Edward Gondolf, director of research for the Mid-Atlantic Addiction Research and Training Institute, calls“bad science.” Statistics suggesting gender parity in abuse are taken out of necessary context, they say, ignoring distinctions between the equally divided “common couple violence” and the sort of escalated, continuing violence known as battery—which is 85 percent male-perpetrated—as well as the disparate injuries inflicted by men and women.

“The biggest concern, though, is not the wasted effort on a false issue,” writes Straton, but the encouragement given to batterers to consider themselves the victimized party. “Arming these men with warped statistics to fuel their already warped worldview is unethical, irresponsible, and quite simply lethal.”

In this, critics like Australian sociologist Michael Flood say that men’s rights movements reflect the tactics of domestic abusers themselves, minimizing existing violence, calling it mutual, and discrediting victims. MRA groups downplay national abuse rates, just as abusers downplay their personal battery; they wage campaigns dismissing most allegations as false, as abusers claim partners are lying about being hit; and they depict the violence as mutual—part of an epidemic of wife-on-husband abuse—as individual batterers rationalize their behavior by saying that the violence was reciprocal. Additionally, MRA groups’ predictions of future violence by fed-up men wronged by the family-law system seem an obvious additional correlation, with the threat of violence seemingly intended to intimidate a community, like a fearful spouse, into compliance.

MRA critics say the organizational recapitulation of abusive tactics should be no surprise, considering the wealth of movement leaders with records or accusations of violence, abuse, harassment, or failure to pay child support. Some advocates call MRA groups “the abuser’s lobby,” because of members like Jason Hutch, the Buckingham Palace fathers’ rights “Batman,” who has been estranged from three mothers of his children and was taken to court for threatening one of his ex-wives.

Contrary to RADAR’s claims, domestic-violence advocates say that not only do abuse accusations not automatically win custody cases for women; there are a rising number of custody decisions awarded to abusive fathers, as judges see wives eager to protect their children as less cooperative regarding custody. More than half the time, studies have found, wives’ accusations of domestic violence are met with counter-accusations from husbands of “Parental Alienation Syndrome”—a medically unrecognized diagnosis that suggests mothers have poisoned their children into making false accusations against their fathers.

In one recent case, Genia Shockome, a Russian immigrant, was fighting for custody of her two children with her ex-husband, whom she charged had beaten her so severely that she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and who had told her she “had no right to leave” since he’d brought her to the United States. The judge in the case sided with her husband’s counter-claims of Parental Alienation Syndrome and awarded him full custody (and later sentenced Shockome to 30 days in jail while she was seven months pregnant). When her attorney, Barry Goldstein, co-author of the forthcoming book Domestic Violence, Abuse and Custody, criticized the judge in an online article, the judge retaliated with a complaint, and Goldstein was given a five-year suspension. Goldstein says the sanction represents a chilling pressure on attorneys, who may now fear penalties for criticizing a court’s gender bias that will interfere with their duties to their clients and that could result in women deciding not to leave abusers out of fear they won’t get a fair trial.

If cases such as Genia Shockome’s are the fodder of mainstream fathers’ rights advocates like Glenn Sacks—who ridiculed her claims and loss of custody as an uncredible “cause célèbre” for feminist family-law reformers—what Sacks calls the movement’s “lunatic fringe” is more vitriolic yet.

Within the ranks of the men’s rights movement, vigilante “resisters” are regularly nominated and lionized for acts of violence perceived to be in opposition to a feminist status quo [3]. In a few quarters of the movement, this even included George Sodini, the Pittsburgh man who opened fire on a gym full of exercising women this August, killing three and leaving behind an online diatribe journaling his sense of rejection by millions of desirable women.

Sodini’s diary was republished widely, including on the website of a popular men’s rights blogger, “Angry Harry,” who added his assessment of the case [4]. “MRAs should also take note of the fact that there are probably many millions of men across the western world who feel similar in many ways, and one can expect to see much more destruction emanating from them in the future,” he wrote. “One of the main reasons that I decided to post this diary on this website was because the western world must wake up to the fact that it cannot continue to treat men so appallingly and get away with it.” In a phone interview, Angry Harry said, “Of course there will be more Sodinis—there will be many more,” likening him to Marc Lépine, a Canadian man who killed or wounded 28, claiming feminists had ruined his life, or Nevada father Darren Mack, who murdered his estranged wife and attempted to kill the judge in their custody battle. (Also among this number is John Muhammad, the “D.C. Beltway Sniper,” whose involvement in a Washington father’s rights group and history of abuse is described in his ex-wife Mildred’s newly-released memoir, Scared Silent[5].) Perhaps, Angry Harry mused, that as the ranks of online MRAs grow, “the threat” of their violence “may be enough” to bring about the changes they desire.

Glenn Sacks dismissed Angry Harry as an “idiot” without real power in the movement, and yet he cautiously defends him. “I want to be careful in wording this,” he says, “but the cataclysmic things I’m seeing done to men, it’s always my fear that one of these guys is going to do something terrible. I don’t want to say that like I condone it or that it’s OK, but it’s just the reality.” The movement seems eager to supply more martyrs. After Sacks wrote about a San Diego father who shot himself on the city’s courthouse steps over late child-support payments, numerous men wrote Sacks, telling him, “They’re taking everything from me, and I want to go out in a big way, and if I do, will you write about me?”

I asked RADAR’s Mark Rosenthal about the ties between groups like RADAR—claiming, however cynically, to have egalitarian motives—and the blunt anti-feminist positions of men’s movement allies like Chapin or Angry Harry. “I’d like to suggest that what you’ve just done is interview Martin Luther King and Malcolm X,” he told me. “In any movement, there is going to be a reasonable voice and people who are so hurt, who are so injured by the injustices, that they can’t afford to step back and try to take their emotions under control. But no movement is going to get anywhere without extremists.”

Photograph of a man by George Doyle/Stockbyte/Getty Creative Images.


Source URL: http://www.doublex.com/section/news-politics/mens-rights-groups-have-become-frighteningly-effective

Links:
[1] http://www.doublex.com/users/kathryn-joyce
[2] http://www.mediaradar.org/
[3] http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/06/18/the_death_of_macho
[4] http://www.angryharry.com/esGeorgeSodini.htm
[5] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1593092415?ie=UTF8&tag=dblx-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1593092415
[6] http://www.doublex.com/section/news-politics/does-rick-warren’s-church-condone-domestic-violence
[7] http://www.doublex.com/section/news-politics/are-men-second-sex-now
[8] http://www.doublex.com/section/news-politics/whats-problem-now-feminisms-dilemmas

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Posted in : Child Abuse, Crime, Families, Juvenile Crime, Murder,, Abuse, Abused Children, Abuser, Don Hoffman FR Layer Topeka Kansas, Hal Richard, Activism, Best interest of children, Best interest of the child, Best interest of the children, California, Call to action, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Children and Domestic Viol, Amy Leitchberg, Anne Grant, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Battered Mothers Custody Conference-Battered Women, Blogroll, CIVIL RIGHTS, CPS, Child Abuse, Child Custody Issues Battered Women, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Do, Child Custody, Child Custody Battle, Domestic Abuse, Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence, Family Court Reform, Family Courts, Family Rights, Human Rights,Husbands who murder wives, Intimate Partner, Child Custody-, Child found,, Children's rights, Cohersive Control, Genocide Battered Women, Collin Momany, Phoenix, Arizona, Corrupt bastards, Crisis in America's Family Courts, Curt and Christi Brungardt, Custody Hell, Custody scam the lizlibrary, Dead,Apparent,Double,Murder,Suicide,Texas,, Domestic Law, Domestic Violence, Domestic Violence on rise in shawnee county, Don Hoffman, Dr. David Rodehheffer, Topeka Court Whore, Eric, Family Anilhition-the killers are fathers, Family Violence, GOVERNMENT OPPRESSION, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Governor sebelius, Hal Richardson wife beater child abuser topeka kansas, Human Rights, Industry of abuse, Jana Mackey, Jason Hoffman, Court Appointed Child Abusers, Jessica Gonzales, Castle Rock, CO- Inter-American Commission Human Rights-Violence Against women, Judge, Judge Punishs Mom for not following Orders of Abuse, Judge david 'death' Debenham, Jurror 13, Jurror Thirteen, www.EyesForJustice.com,, KS -Outraged जुद्गेस, KS protective parent reform act, KTKA49 News, Jessica Drew, Domestic Violence Topeka, KU Basketball, Kansas NOW Lobbyist, Kansas University, Knoxville, Little hostages, M. Jill Dykes, Martinez, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Maternal Deprivation, Nazi America, Human Expieriments, Mother of Murdered Children Speaks, Amy Castillo, Motherhood, Mothers Rights, OUTRAGEOUSE, Odysseey Group Topeka Kansas a perps BEST FRIEND, Odyssey KS Drex Flott MSW, Odyssey KS Kara Haney MS, Over,homicide,victims,attacker,tools,behavior,relations, PAS- Perpetrators Aligning Strategically, Parental Alienation Syndrome, Parental Alienation=Pepetrators Aligning Stategiaclly, Powell, Proclamation Day, Reform Family Courts, Sean, Shared Parenting, Batterer women dead children,, Speak Out, Susan Murphy Milano, Maternal Deprivation, System abuse, Torture Shared Parenting, PAS PAS PAS, Un-Justice System, Upon, Washburn University, affair, agreement, child rapists, children, children-need-both-parents, contempt, custody, death, domestic-violence-awareness,, family court corruption, fathers rights-abusers rights, fees, guardian, homicide, human trafficking, jill dykes court appointed child abuser, judicial corruption, legal kidnapping, logic, lover, murder murder domestic violence fatalaties, orders, parent, parental alienation =perps aligning strategically, profiting, psychiatrist, theraputic jurisprudence, whores of the court, whores of the court, the falling of abusers rights,, • CUSTODY ISSUES FALSE ALLEGATIONS FAMILY COURT FEMICIDE MURDER-SUICIDE UNCATEGORIZED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Leave a Comment »